Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Fed aid for Big 3 pushed

Michigan delegation makes nonpartisan effort for billions in tax
credits, subsidies, loans.
David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- Michigan's congressional delegation is mounting a major
push to help Detroit's Big Three automakers get about $27 billion in
federal aid over the next five years.

The behind-the-scenes efforts come amid growing concerns about the fate
of the struggling domestic automakers. General Motors Corp., Ford Motor
Co. and Chrysler LLC are paring back salaried staff, closing plants and
dramatically cutting expenses at a time when the economy is in turmoil
and auto sales could hit their lowest level in 17 years.

Many Michigan congressional members think that if they don't start a
concerted effort now to win significant financial support for
automakers, it will be harder to do so later. Some of the proposals
under consideration are the most generous considered since the 1979
Chrysler bailout, though they face long odds from a largely skeptical
Congress.

The chiefs of staff and top auto policy aides to most of Michigan's
17-member congressional delegation met privately Friday to discuss a
broad set of policies to help the industry. The meeting was organized by
the office of Rep. John Dingell, D-Dearborn, chairman of the House
Energy and Commerce committee, which has jurisdiction over many auto
issues. Topics included subsidies to cover one-third of automakers'
losses, government-issued loans, loan guarantees and bigger tax credits
for the industry and consumers.

The Detroit News obtained a one-page summary of the proposal discussed
at the meeting that calls for $5 billion in direct loans over five
years; $3 billion a year for five years to help speed the retirement of
1.5 million older, less efficient vehicles; and $2 billion over five
years in tax breaks for advanced vehicles.

The group also called for $800 million over three years to develop an
"advanced battery trust fund" to help build three domestic battery
manufacturing facilities and for working in 2009 to block California
from being able to impose its own emissions standards.

There are signs that Congress may be more agreeable to offering
automakers some assistance. More than 70 members signed a letter
released Monday urging Congress to include funding for $25 billion in
loan guarantees for automakers over five years in a second stimulus
package that may be considered in September. The guarantees would cost
the Treasury $3.75 billion.

Congress approved the program in December when it ordered automakers to
increase fuel efficiency standards 40 percent by 2020, but it didn't
allocate any money to fund it. Through the 2015 model year, automakers
will have to spend $47 billion to comply with the higher requirements.

The loan guarantees are important because Detroit's automakers have
sub-investment grade credit ratings, which make it difficult and more
expensive to borrow money. The guarantees would let them borrow up to 30
percent of the cost of retooling plants. Ford announced last week it
plans to convert two U.S. truck plants to building smaller more
efficient vehicles.

"It's important that we help the industry retool to create American
jobs," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Lansing. "I don't want automakers to
decide it would be less expensive to build a plant in China."

Michigan members are planning to send a letter to congressional
leadership urging action on some of the items and to again extend
unemployment benefits in states like Michigan with high jobless rates.

Michigan legislators also note that automakers face a potentially rocky
road when the next president takes office. Both candidates Barack Obama
and John McCain have endorsed giving California and other states the
right to impose tailpipe emissions limits, while Obama also wants to
increase a fuel economy mandate to a fleet-wide average of 50 mpg by
2026.

"The federal government must be an active partner in the effort to
create these jobs and technologies here in the United States," said Rep.
Sander Levin, D-Royal Oak.

For more than two years, proposals to help automakers have gone largely
nowhere though a housing bill President Bush is to sign later this week
will give each of the companies about $30 million in tax rebates.

In April, Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Bloomfield Township, proposed $1.2
billion in aid to domestic automakers and rewriting the tax code to save
automakers another $3.5 billion.

David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, said
anything Congress could do "to help the domestics with their cash
position would be very helpful." But he conceded it is "unlikely."

"Congress doesn't often respond strategically," he said. "In a crisis
they opt for short-term measures."

Bush is opposed to an automaker bailout, while Obama hasn't directly
addressed the issue. McCain told Dow Jones earlier "he would consider
all options" if GM neared collapse.

GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner spoke with Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio,
after the automaker announced its plan to boost liquidity by cutting
expenses by $10 billion by 2009 and raising another $5 billion through
asset sales and borrowing. They discussed the loan guarantees among
other issues, said Greg Martin, a GM spokesman.

Some auto officials think they should try to get a broader package of
support, because Congress may not be inclined to grant them a second
round of help.

John Diamond, an economist in tax policy at Rice University, said
Congress has been under pressure to bail out many sectors, noting it is
on the hook for as much as $25 billion from the Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac bailouts. "The case for an auto bailout may have gotten weaker in
the last 30 years," he said, noting Congress "may be a little hesitant"
to take on more.

You can reach David Shepardson at (202) 662-8735 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to