On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:37:31 -0700 "Jim Devine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this concept makes any sense, then necessary lawyerage would > promote economic growth and surplus lawyerage would hurt it. Of > course, the lawyers help determine exactly what we mean by "economic > growth." I suppose if one accepts the notion of surplus value one might as well accept the notion of surplus lawyerage. (I find it a little harder to believe in necessary lawyerage, though presumably that's an entailment.) Still -- what order of effect could something like this have on economic growth? Fifth? Tenth? _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
