On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ehrbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In order to better understand the implications of carbon rationing, I
> went through the math of solving a consumer choice problem with a
> simple utility function and carbon rationing.  The paper in its
> present version is on my web site at
>
> http://www.econ.utah.edu/~ehrbar/cccr.pdf
>

Some thoughts on this:

No amount of carbon rationing will build trains. Unless your
transmission grid is "merchant" transmission it won't produce grid
improvements there - and even then it requires tendatious assumptions
about how consumer demand translates into capital investment. That, by
the way, is a  criticism of any system that relies on price as a
primary driver of change. Fundamentally what you are trying to drive
is an infrastructure change, massive capital investment.  A price or
rationing system many contribute to this, but it will never be the
primary driver.  If you want ta historical example, think of war
conversion in the U.S. during WWII.  A rationing system did play an
important role, but the fundamental drivers was the government turning
to industry and saying "you build cars and trucks: build tanks. you
build civilian ships: build a fighting fleet. Here are orders for
planes, and guns and bullets." Rationing was reinforcement. My
criticism is the same that it has been all along.  You are assuming
too much about how infrastructure gets transformed without paying
enough attention to the actual history of how such changes take place.


Also, when you mention the problems a rationing system has in dealing
with changes in carbon pricing: all existing proposals based  carbon
price depends on an incrementally increasing price. So I do want to
compliment you on your intellectual integrity in exposing a flaw in
your own system. (Not irony - all academics are supposed to do this;
but it is seldom honored as much in practice as much as it is in
principle.)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to