Craig Freedman sent me a copy of an interview did with a distinguished
economist. with regard to the subject of behavioral economics, the
economist said, in effect, no way. do you think I am going to throw away
a lifetime of work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you classify models that Bowles talks about in *Microeconomics*
where there are individual utility functions, emphasis plural, with
interactive features?
Or models that incorporate game theory.
this mostly seems to be a matter of behavioral (a.k.a. experimental)
economics. It's a good thing, but it must be stressed that behavioral
economics almost never gets beyond the individualistic approach of
neoclassical economics.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901
www.michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
