what irritates me is pretty much everything blackburn identifies in his review. and it's not at all clear from the review that anything sokal says is "beyond" the hoax.
/au-dela de l'hoax? ;-) //levinas fans? anyone? anyone? On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Charles Brown < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Jeffrey Fisher" 2/U > > i'm no big fan of blackburn's, and disagree with a lot of what he does, > but i passed this one along to some friends in part because he manages > to articulate very nicely what has always irritated me about the hoax > (and sokal's continuing to find more ways to capitalized on it), and in > part because i think his point about dogmatism is similarly well-stated, > and could be applied equally to philosophers (rather than only to > scientists, at whom he directs it). > > ^^^^ > CB: What irritates you about the hoax ? > > Wonder what Sokal says is beyond the hoax. > > > This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. > www.surfcontrol.com > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
