Julio:

> Precisely.  I'm referring to that passage in Capital where Marx quotes
> Shakespeare (?) about the divorce between C-M and M-C.  Love's course
> never runs smooth (?) or something like that.

You ordered them the other way around: the sequence should have been
M-C and then C-M'. (Note the prime.)

In other words, at certain times for whatever reason, rather than
M-C-M', it may be easier to go the M-M' way, and this is when finance
comes into play the dominant role, not that it does not play any role
during the M-C-M' period.

Does anyone have any doubts that we have been going through an M-M'
period, at least, in the US?

Best,
Sabri
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to