Julio: > Precisely. I'm referring to that passage in Capital where Marx quotes > Shakespeare (?) about the divorce between C-M and M-C. Love's course > never runs smooth (?) or something like that.
You ordered them the other way around: the sequence should have been M-C and then C-M'. (Note the prime.) In other words, at certain times for whatever reason, rather than M-C-M', it may be easier to go the M-M' way, and this is when finance comes into play the dominant role, not that it does not play any role during the M-C-M' period. Does anyone have any doubts that we have been going through an M-M' period, at least, in the US? Best, Sabri _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
