PEN-Lers,

I'm having a discussion on an anthropologhy listserv about the labor theory of 
value and one wrote the following (below). (including the note that J. 
Galbraith is advisor to Obama) Is it true? best, Brian

_______________________________________________________________________
The revival of the labor theory of value in conventional economics is credited 
to 
Piero Sraffa, 1898-1983.
The following is from the History of Economics website at the New School:? 
http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/

"The shy, Italian-born Sraffa was brought by John Maynard Keynes to Cambridge 
in the 1920s. A close friend of the Italian revolutionary Antonio Gramsci, 
Sraffa has been sometimes considered a "closet Marxian" - and, apparently, he 
would sometimes be quite explicit about his loyalties - although the 1920s 
England was not exactly welcoming to Marxian radicals. 

Sraffa quickly became a fixture in the Cambridge world. He was part of the 
legendary "cafeteria group" with Frank Ramsey and Ludwig Wittgenstein which 
explored the 1921 probability treatise of J.M. Keynes. Sraffa ganged up with 
Keynes to bury Friedrich Hayek in the business cycle debates. 

Nonetheless, Sraffa's shyness in front of his students made lecturing a hellish 
experience.? Ever resourceful, Keynes arranged for Sraffa to be appointed as a 
librarian of King's College and, to keep him busy, got the Royal Society to 
hand over the task of editing a new collected edition of David Ricardo 's works 
over to him.? Sraffa's painstaking and meticulous collecting and editing of 
Ricardo's works, begun in 1931, turned out to be a 20-year-task!??? Although 
already in the printers in 1943, the edition? was delayed after the last-minute 
discovery of a trunk full of Ricardo's papers in Ireland.? Publication finally 
began (after Maurice Dobb got on board as assistant) in 1953.? It was a 
formidable edition.? As George Stigler was to put it later in his review, 
"Ricardo was a fortunate man.. And now, 130 years after his death, he is as 
fortunate as ever : he has been befriended by Sraffa." (Stigler, 1953).? 
Sraffa's introduction to the works was perhaps one of the most rema!
 rkable interpretations of the tenets of Classical and Neoclassical theory in 
the history of economic thought.? 

The outgrowth of these efforts was one of the longest-gestating works in 
economic theory.? Begun in the 1920s, Sraffa's Production of Commodities by 
Means of Commodities, a terse, hundred-page text which finally emerged in 1960. 
This book solved and restated Ricardo's theory [i.e. the labor theory of value] 
for the moderns - inspiring the "Classical Revival" spearheaded by the 
Neo-Ricardians at Cambridge and elsewhere in the 1960s and 1970s."

 [i.e. the labor theory of value] for the moderns - inspiring the "Classical 
Revival" spearheaded by the Neo-Ricardians at Cambridge and elsewhere in the 
1960s and 1970s."

[Anthropologist Joe's]?notion of labor constructing "values in and of the 
biophysical word" is of a different epistemological status than the economic 
labor theory of value as conceived by Ricardo through Sraffa and on to today. 
However, that is another discussion. I've always believed that labor + 
energy/materials account for value - surplus or otherwise - with technology 
placed within labor. Some within Ecological Economics have worked on an energy 
theory of value - Bob Costanza comes to mind.? 

On a related note, I believe Jamie Galbraith at the U. of Texas and an advisor 
to the Obama campaign is someone who incorporates the Sraffra influenced labor 
theory of value into his economics.?
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to