Julio Huato schreef:
Agustin Cueva posed all these questions most sharply, in Marxist
terms, and showed how the answers supplied by the dependency theorists
were mostly wrongheaded in its understanding, predictions, and
political implications. IMO, what happened in Latin America and the
world in the 3 subsequent decades was not only unexpected, but
incomprehensible under the paradigm of dependency theory, while
entirely discernible under Marxism.
What is Cueva's reasoning to consider the two incompatible in the first
place? I don't see why they would be.
Matthijs Krul
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
