John Adams wrote:

> I'm still wondering how the Bolsheviks could
> have been suckered into supporting Kerensky.
> Big mistake, dude.

Right.  Interesting analogy.  Talking about the anniversary of the
October revolution.

The Bolsheviks supported Kerensky until they didn't.  They set out to
overthrow Kerensky in the fall, when he refused to go after Kornilov,
who was openly plotting against the revolution (the February
revolution, that is).

The immediate reason why the Bolsheviks overthrew Kerensky was not
because he was in the way of peace, bread, and land for Russia, the
immediate demands of the Bolshevik, which put them at odds with
Kerensy after February.  No, it wasn't because Kerensky betrayed the
hopes he had raised with regards to ending the war and re-distributing
the land of the tsar and his aristocrats.  (Nothing to do with
socialism.)

If peace, bread, and land (demands with tremendous popular appeal in
Russia after February, especially in the climate of revolutionary
enthusiasm that followed the dethroning of the tsar and the extension
of a bloody war) had been the exclusive grounds to stage the Bolshevik
insurrection, the insurrection would have had a much harder time.
Perhaps it would have failed.

Those issues the Bolsheviks were entirely willing to settle through
the mechanisms of soviet democracy.  Lenin's slogan to deal with
Kerensky after it became clear that he was not stopping the war and
the time before Kornilov's plotting became too overt to ignore wasn't
"To hell with the February revolution" but "Explain patiently."  Even
after Kornilov's threat went beyond mere threats and death squad
selective repression began, the Bolsheviks weren't ready.  At some
point, Lenin had to shave his goatee and escape to Finland to avoid
being killed.

No, the immediate reason or, rather, the political and *ethical*
justification brandished by the Bolshevisk to overthrow Kerensky's
government was that, in the face of an imminent coup by the
restorationists, overthrowing it was necessary to abort a coup by
Kornilov and thus to preserve the *democratic* conquests of the
February revolution.

Am I right?  Chris, Charles, or other Russian revolution history junkies?
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to