On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > that said, the basic argument that their exclusion is discriminatory > seems > > pretty straightforward. > > doesn't it? > > yes, but even better would be to get all religious stuff out of the > public park. Their religion points up the silliness inherent in all > religions. oh, right. yes, of course. that was sort of what i meant -- the way you avoid the discrimination is just by not having any such things there in the first place.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
