Well, the short answer would be that nationalisation can be articulated to notions of the nation as well as to a notion of the workers. Those are very different - crudely, one leads to fascism, the other leads to communism.
Mark 2008/12/9 raghu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure how dirty a word it is, but the answer to the question is > > that the illusion that "nationalization = Socialism" is not confined > > to posters on pen-l but is widely believed. So the question should be, > > why is socialism a dirty word in America. There is no necessary > > relationship between nationalizatio and socialism, but almost everyone > > believes there is. > > > Can you explain this? Nationalization means collective ownership of > means of production (at least in a democratic society) which at least > hints of socialism, right? > -raghu. > > > -- > "Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time." - Steven > Wright > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
