In a message dated 12/11/2008 2:13:40 P.M. Eastern Standard  Time, 
[email protected] writes:


>>> "GM, Ford and Chrysler still carry  significant cost disadvantages 
against Toyota plants located in the United  States, thanks to clumsy 
management and unrealistic wages, excessive  fringe benefits and arcane 
work rules imposed by United Autoworker  contracts."
--"The Big Drag," Peter Morici, CounterPunch, December 11,  2008

Actually, this item is an example of the strength and weakness of  
CounterPoint. In addition to denouncing a decent standard of living as  
unrealistic, Morici relates a startling and rarely seen comparison: "In  
2008 the Chinese government is on track to purchase about $685 billion  
in foreign currencies. This comes to about 18 percent of China's GDP and  
about 46 percent of its exports of goods and  services."

CounterPunch does not have comments and does not encourage  debate among 
its contributors, although their viewpoints are all over the  map. <<<<

Charles Andrews
 
Actually, all of the quoted above is simply a lie.   What on earth is clumsy 
management? UAW workers wages are not unrealistic!!!  The cause of the current 
crisis unfolding in the auto industry is not the  result of wages but an 
obvious across the board market contraction. Rather  than producing and selling 
17 
1/2 million new vehicles, as was the case for  most of the past decade, only 
10 1/2 million new vehicles will be sold in  2008. The world industry is off - 
depressed, by roughly 30% everywhere. This  includes Toyota, Nissan and 
Daimler America. 
 
Union production workers are paid an average of $28 an hour  and the 
non-union production workers are paid an average of $25 an hour. What  in fact 
is 
so-called unrealistic wages in the context of auto?  

What "arcane work rules (are) imposed by United Autoworker  contracts."? 
Apparently the ranting against arcane work rules is meant to  imply that the 
UAW 
plants are somehow less productive than their Japanese or  German counterparts 
in America.  To begin with the union does not impose  work rules as such. The 
work rules grew out of the evolving division of labor  of the craft 
organization  of auto, going back a few decades before the  industrial unions 
appeared. 


What the union did was to codify the existing rules  as an index. The work 
process and work rules change with changes in the  material factors of 
production. 
 
Waistline 






**************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and 
favorite sites in one place.  Try it now. 
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to