I agree with what Gene Coyle said, although not with his terminology.  

I regard the crisis in the manifestation of deeper contradictions that may 
be pestering over a long period of time. The Taft-Hartley law was the 
opening salvo in a long struggle to roll back the New Deal.  The 1960s were 
a setback to this project, but it picked up with a vengeance during the 
1970s.

The Confiscation of American Prosperity fortuitously came out in October 
2007, while the stock market was peaking.  I concentrated on the period 
following the 1960s, but Gene's starting point is also a good place to 
begin.  Class warfare increased profits, which followed a Minsky-like 
trajectory to hedge financing and finally Ponzi status.

But the underlying problem was not finance, but rather an ongoing neglect 
of basic forces of production, both human and produced.  Kindleberger once 
wrote: "Details proliferate; structure abides."

I'm not alone in making this point, but it has certainly not been center 
stage in much discussion lately.  Gene deserves credit for bringing it to 
our attention.



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to