We now know why Obama can forbid US torture. He will probably outsource 
torture to other countries using rendition. Of course he will always as did 
Bush obtain guarantees that there will be no torture.

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-rendition1-2009feb01,0,2022513,print.story

  


http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-rendition1-2009feb01,0,7767580.story?page=2&track=ntothtml

>From the Los Angeles Times
Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool
The role of the CIA's controversial prisoner-transfer program may expand, 
intelligence experts say.
By Greg Miller

February 1, 2009

Reporting from Washington — The CIA's secret prisons are being shuttered. Harsh 
interrogation techniques are off-limits. And Guantanamo Bay will eventually go 
back to being a wind-swept naval base on the southeastern corner of Cuba.

But even while dismantling these programs, President Obama left intact an 
equally controversial counter-terrorism tool. 

Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to 
carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of 
prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States.

Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said that the rendition program 
might be poised to play an expanded role going forward because it was the main 
remaining mechanism -- aside from Predator missile strikes -- for taking 
suspected terrorists off the street.

The rendition program became a source of embarrassment for the CIA, and a 
target of international scorn, as details emerged in recent years of botched 
captures, mistaken identities and allegations that prisoners were turned over 
to countries where they were tortured.

The European Parliament condemned renditions as "an illegal instrument used by 
the United States." Prisoners swept up in the program have sued the CIA as well 
as a Boeing Co. subsidiary accused of working with the agency on dozens of 
rendition flights.

But the Obama administration appears to have determined that the rendition 
program was one component of the Bush administration's war on terrorism that it 
could not afford to discard.

The decision underscores the fact that the battle with Al Qaeda and other 
terrorist groups is far from over and that even if the United States is 
shutting down the prisons, it is not done taking prisoners.

"Obviously you need to preserve some tools -- you still have to go after the 
bad guys," said an Obama administration official, speaking on condition of 
anonymity when discussing the legal reasoning. "The legal advisors working on 
this looked at rendition. It is controversial in some circles and kicked up a 
big storm in Europe. But if done within certain parameters, it is an acceptable 
practice."

One provision in one of Obama’s orders appears to preserve the CIA's ability to 
detain and interrogate terrorism suspects as long as they are not held 
long-term. The little-noticed provision states that the instructions to close 
the CIA's secret prison sites "do not refer to facilities used only to hold 
people on a short-term, transitory basis."

Despite concern about rendition, Obama's prohibition of many other 
counter-terrorism tools could prompt intelligence officers to resort more 
frequently to the "transitory" technique.

The decision to preserve the program did not draw major protests, even among 
human rights groups. Leaders of such organizations attribute that to a sense 
that nations need certain tools to combat terrorism. 

"Under limited circumstances, there is a legitimate place" for renditions, said 
Tom Malinowski, the Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "What 
I heard loud and clear from the president's order was that they want to design 
a system that doesn't result in people being sent to foreign dungeons to be 
tortured -- but that designing that system is going to take some time."

Malinowski said he had urged the Obama administration to stipulate that 
prisoners could be transferred only to countries where they would be guaranteed 
a public hearing in an official court. "Producing a prisoner before a real 
court is a key safeguard against torture, abuse and disappearance," Malinowski 
said.

CIA veterans involved in renditions characterized the program as important but 
of limited intelligence-gathering use. It is used mainly for terrorism suspects 
not considered valuable enough for the CIA to keep, they said.

"The reason we did interrogations [ourselves] is because renditions for the 
most part weren't very productive," said a former senior CIA official who spoke 
on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject.

The most valuable intelligence on Al Qaeda came from prisoners who were in CIA 
custody and questioned by agency experts, the official said. Once prisoners 
were turned over to Egypt, Jordan or elsewhere, the agency had limited 
influence over how much intelligence was shared, how prisoners were treated and 
whether they were later released.

"In some ways, [rendition] is the worst option," the former official said. "If 
they are in U.S. hands, you have a lot of checks and balances, medics and 
lawyers. Once you turn them over to another service, you lose control."

In his executive order on lawful interrogations, Obama created a task force to 
reexamine renditions to make sure that they "do not result in the transfer of 
individuals to other nations to face torture," or otherwise circumvent human 
rights laws and treaties.

The CIA has long maintained that it does not turn prisoners over to other 
countries without first obtaining assurances that the detainees will not be 
mistreated. 

In a 2007 speech, https:// 
www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2007/general-haydens-remarks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html
 "> 
www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2007/general-haydens-remarks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html
 the agency had to make a determination in every case "that it is less, rather 
than more, likely that the individual will be tortured." He added that the CIA 
sought "true assurances" and that "we're not looking to shave this 49-51." 

Even so, the rendition program became a target of fierce criticism during the 
Bush administration as a series of cases surfaced.

In one of the most notorious instances, a German citizen named Khaled Masri was 
arrested in Macedonia in 2003 and whisked away by the CIA to a secret prison in 
Afghanistan. He was quietly released in Albania five months later after the 
agency determined it had mistaken Masri for an associate of the Sept. 11 
hijackers.

Masri later described being abducted by "seven or eight men dressed in black 
and wearing black ski masks." He said he was stripped of his clothes, placed in 
a diaper and blindfolded before being taken aboard a plane in shackles -- an 
account that matches other descriptions of prisoners captured in the rendition 
program.

In another prominent case, an Egyptian cleric known as Abu Omar was abducted in 
Italy in 2003 and secretly flown to an Egyptian jail, where he said he was 
tortured. The incident became a major source of embarrassment to the CIA when 
Italian authorities, using cellphone records, identified agency operatives 
involved in the abduction and sought to prosecute them.

Defenders of the rendition program point out that it has been an effective tool 
since the early 1990s and was often used to bring terrorism suspects to courts 
in the United States. Among them was Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, who was captured in 
Pakistan and was convicted of helping orchestrate the 1993 World Trade Center 
bombing.

Because details on the rendition program are classified, the scale of the 
program has been a subject of wide-ranging speculation.

An exhaustive investigation by the European Union concluded that the CIA had 
operated more than 1,200 flights in European airspace after the Sept. 11 
attacks. 

The implication was that most were rendition-related, with some taking suspects 
to states where they faced torture.

But U.S. intelligence officials contend that the EU report greatly exaggerated 
the scale of the program and that most of the flights documented by the 
Europeans involved moving supplies and CIA personnel, not prisoners.

Instead, recent comments by Hayden suggest that the program has been used to 
move no more than a handful of prisoners in recent years and that the total is 
in the "midrange two figures" since the Sept. 11 attacks. 

[email protected]




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Copyright 2009 Los Angeles Times | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
 
  



Blog:  http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html
Blog:  http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to