- President Barack Obama warned on Thursday that failure to act on an economic 
recovery package could plunge the nation into a long-lasting recession that 
might prove irreversible, a fresh call to a recalcitrant Congress to move 
quickly.

^^^^^^
CB: What more specifically does irreversible mean ?

^^^^

This recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more 
jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper 
into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse," Obama wrote 
in the op-ed titled, "The Action Americans Need."

Senate Democratic leaders hope for passage of the legislation by Friday at the 
latest, although prospects appear to hinge on crafting a series of spending 
reductions that would make the bill more palatable to centrists in both parties.

Obama rejected the argument that more tax cuts are needed in the plan and that 
piecemeal measures would be sufficient, arguing that Americans made their 
intentions clear in the election.

"I reject these theories, and so did the American people when they went to the 
polls in November and voted resoundingly for change," he wrote.

Historically huge to begin with, economic stimulus legislation is growing 
larger by the day in the Senate, where the addition of a new tax break for 
homebuyers sent the price tag well past $900 billion.

"It is time to fix housing first," Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said Wednesday 
night as the Senate agreed without controversy to add the new tax break to the 
stimulus measure, at an estimated cost of nearly $19 billion.

The tax break was the most notable attempt to date to add help for the crippled 
housing industry and gave Republicans a victory as they work to remake the 
legislation more to their liking.

Three swing-vote senators met with Obama at the White House on Wednesday to 
discuss possible cutbacks, but they declined to discuss details of their talks. 
Obama has made the legislation a cornerstone of his recovery plan.

For their part, Senate Republicans signaled they would persist in their efforts 
to reduce spending in the measure, to add tax cuts and reduce the cost of 
mortgages for millions of homeowners.

Officials figures were unavailable, but it appeared that the measure carried a 
price tag of more than $920 billion, making it bigger than the financial 
industry bailout that passed last year and as large as any measure in memory.

Despite bipartisan concerns about the cost, Republicans failed in a series of 
attempts on Wednesday to cut back the bill's size.

The most sweeping proposal, advanced by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., would have 
eliminated all the spending and replaced it with a series of tax cuts. It was 
defeated 61-36.

Democrats also upheld a so-called Buy American provision that requires projects 
financed by the measure to be built with domestically produced iron and steel.

But with Obama voicing concern about the provision, the requirement was changed 
to specify that U.S. international trade agreements not to be violated.

Additionally, Democrats turned back an attempt to strip out a provision that 
Obama has said was essential. It would provide a tax cut of up to $1,000 for 
working couples, including those who do not make enough to pay income taxes.

Isakson said the new tax break for homebuyers was intended to help revive the 
housing industry, which has virtually collapsed in the wake of a credit crisis 
that began last fall. 

The proposal would allow a tax credit of 10 percent of the value of new or 
existing residences, up to a $15,000 limit. Current law provides for a $7,500 
tax break but only for first-time homebuyers. 

Isakson's office said the proposal would cost the government an estimated $19 
billion. 

The provision was the second tax cut approved in as many days targeted to 
individual industries. On Tuesday, the Senate voted to give a break to 
consumers who buy new cars. 

The House approved its own version of the bill last week.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090205/ap_on_go_pr_wh/congress_stimulus



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to