From: Seth Sandronsky <ssandron...@xxxxxxxxx> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Lowry, editor of the "conservative" National Review, argues for a 
“semi-nationalization" of insolvent U.S. banks. 

 

Seth     

 

February 13, 2009 12:00 AM

Caution: Zombie Economy Ahead

The Japanese example must not be repeated.

By Rich Lowry

 

Computer hackers managed to hijack a digital road sign in Austin, Texas, the 
other day and change its message to “Zombies Ahead.”

 

It was a whimsical warning for that stretch of Texas road, but could have 
served as a deadly earnest statement about the U.S. economy. “Zombie banks” was 
the term for Japanese financial institutions propped up by government in the 
1990s despite their basic insolvency after a real-estate bubble. These 
unprofitable banks, in a financial revenge of the living dead, cast a 
decade-long pall over Japan.

 

At the time, American officials like Pres. Barack Obama’s economic guru Larry 
Summers urged the Japanese to give up on failed institutions. Instead, Japan 
pumped 12 percent of its gross domestic product into saving the banks and got a 
“lost decade” of economic stagnation in return. Economic analysts across the 
board agree that the Japanese example must not be repeated, even as our 
lawmakers stumble into repeating it.

 

(clip)

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjFhYTExN2JkZTA3NjVlMTVkZTA2ODJmMDdkNTI0ZGE=


 

Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:14:23 -0800

From: John Gulick <john_gul...@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [Pen-l] Cautionary tales from Japan

To: <pe...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc: John Gulick <john_gul...@xxxxxxxxxxx>



 

LP posted:

 

“I think they know how big it is, but they don’t want to say how big it is. 
It’s so big they can’t acknowledge it,” said John H. Makin, an economist at the 
American Enterprise Institute, referring to administration officials. “The 
lesson from Japan in the 1990s was that they should have stepped up and 
nationalized the banks.”

Gulick:

 

Wow, the times, they is a changin'. The AEI is endorsing bank nationalization. 
What could be next? Socialized day care?
 

^^^^^^
How 'bout:


Financial Times - February 18, 2009 
Greenspan backs bank nationalisation By Krishna Guha and Edward Luce in 
Washington 

The US government may have to nationalise some banks on a temporary basis to 
fix the financial system and restore the flow of credit, Alan Greenspan, the 
former Federal Reserve chairman has told the Financial Times. 

In an interview with the FT Mr Greenspan, who for decades was regarded as the 
high priest of laisser-faire capitalism, said nationalisation could be the 
least bad option left for policymakers. 

”It may be necessary to temporarily nationalise some banks in order to 
facilitate a swift and orderly restructuring,” he said. “I understand that once 
in a hundred years this is what you do.” 

Mr Greenspan’s comments capped a frenetic day in which policymakers across the 
political spectrum appeared to be moving towards accepting some form of bank 
nationalisation. 

“We should be focusing on what works,” Lindsey Graham, a Republican senator 
from South Carolina, told the FT. “We cannot keep pouring good money after 
bad.” He added, “If nationalisation is what works, then we should do it.” 

Speaking to the FT ahead of his speech to the Economic Club of New York last 
night, Mr Greenspan said that “in some cases, the least bad solution is for the 
government to take temporary control” of troubled banks either through the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or some other mechanism. 

The former Fed chairman said temporary government ownership would ”allow the 
government to transfer toxic assets to a bad bank without the problem of how to 
price them.” 

But he cautioned that holders of senior debt - bonds that would be paid off 
before other claims - might have to be protected even in the event of 
nationalisation. 

”You would have to be very careful about imposing any loss on senior creditors 
of any bank taken under government control because it could impact the senior 
debt of all other banks,” he said. “This is a credit crisis and it is essential 
to preserve an anchor for the financing of the system. That anchor is the 
senior debt.” 

Mr Greenspan’s comments came as President Barack Obama signed into law the 
$787bn fiscal stimulus in Denver, Colorado. Mr Obama will announce on Wednesday 
a $50bn programme for home foreclosure relief in Phoenix, Arizona. Meanwhile, 
the White House was working last night on the latest phase of the bailout for 
two of the big three US carmakers. 

In his speech after signing the stimulus, which he called the “most sweeping 
recovery package in our history”, Mr Obama set out a vertiginous timetable of 
federal decisions in the coming weeks that included fixing the US banking 
system, submission next week of the 2009 budget and a bipartisan White House 
meeting to address longer- term fiscal discipline. 

“We need to end a culture where we ignore problems until they become full-blown 
crises,” said Mr Obama. “Today does not mark the end of our economic troubles … 
but it does mark the beginning of the end.” 





_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to