On Wednesday, March 4, 2009 at 12:16:08 (-0500) Doug Henwood writes: > >On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Bill Lear wrote: > >> Ok, thanks, but how about for a city not among the 12 or so included? >> Specifically, I'm curious about Austin, TX. > >Try here: <http://www.ofheo.gov/hpi_download.aspx>.
Thank you again. Am I misreading things (probably), or is Austin just not following the downturn rules?: Austin-Round Rock, TX 2005 1 158.49 ( 0.85) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2005 2 161.96 ( 0.85) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2005 3 164.90 ( 0.85) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2005 4 167.38 ( 0.92) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2006 1 169.65 ( 0.95) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2006 2 175.37 ( 0.92) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2006 3 179.00 ( 0.93) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2006 4 182.75 ( 1.02) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2007 1 188.16 ( 1.05) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2007 2 193.76 ( 1.01) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2007 3 196.23 ( 1.03) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2007 4 198.24 ( 1.10) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2008 1 202.82 ( 1.06) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2008 2 203.82 ( 1.10) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2008 3 207.18 ( 1.30) Austin-Round Rock, TX 2008 4 207.03 ( 1.45) -- http://www.ofheo.gov/media/hpi/4q08hpi_cbsa.txt, "4Q 2008 Manipulatable Data for the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)" Bill _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
