>"North Dakota is a sparsely populated state of less than 700,000, known for 
>cold weather, isolated farmers and a hit movie - Fargo. Yet, for some reason 
>it defies the real estate cliche of location, location, location. Since 2000, 
>the state's GNP has grown 56%, personal income has grown 43%, and wages have 
>grown 34%. This year the state has a budget surplus of $1.2 billion!"<

Wait, the whole country grew a lot, too, during the bubble years
(while "Fargo" mostly takes place in Minnesota). It's also a bad sign
that personal incomes and wages lagged so much behind gross state
product.

>What does the State of North Dakota have that other states don't? The answer 
>seems to be: its own bank. In fact, North Dakota has the only state-owned bank 
>in the nation.... <

That's a good thing, if it avoided getting involved in the city
slickers' Standard & Ponzi scheme. But who runs that bank? business,
I'd bet.

> Some experts insist that we must tighten our belts and start saving again, in 
> order to rebuild the "capital" necessary for functioning markets; but our 
> markets actually functioned quite well so long as the credit system was 
> working. We have the same real assets (raw materials, oil, technical 
> knowledge, productive capacity, labor force, et cetera) that we had before 
> the crisis began. Our workers and factories are sitting idle because the 
> private credit system has failed.<

Right, it's like I said in my long missive to David, there are a lot
of real productive assets that can be used. It's not just in ND.

> A system of public credit could put them back to work again. The notion that 
> "money" is something that has to be "saved" before it can be "borrowed" 
> misconstrues the nature of money and credit. Credit is merely a legal 
> agreement, a "monetization" of future proceeds, a promise to pay later from 
> the fruits of the advance. Banks have created credit on their books for 
> hundreds of years, and this system would have worked quite well had it not 
> been for the enormous tribute siphoned off to private coffers in the form of 
> interest. A public banking system could overcome that problem by returning 
> the interest to the public purse. This is the sort of banking system that was 
> pioneered in the colony of Pennsylvania, where it worked brilliantly well. <

this is wishful thinking, isn't it? it's not about to be instituted,
is it? The ND state bank isn't going to be doing monetary policy, I'd
bet.

(you betcha!)
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to