It's a consensus that's clearly subject to the distorting effects of group-think. As we've seen, this can lead to group madness.
^^^^^^ CB: Isn't "group-think" as a derogatory term part of individualist ideological error ? It implies the problem is not thinking for oneself, individually. But the problem is really "one-think" with the rest following the one uncritically. If everybody in the group actually thinks, the thought is likely to be better than "one-think". Two heads are better than one, when both heads are active. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
