Jim Devine wrote:
> But standard economic theory is not like quantum mechanics at all even
> though both give an important role to randomness.

a few years ago someone in the financial "mathematics" business
discovered i do physics and programming, and asked me if i would be
interested in applying some ideas in quantum field theory to the
pricing of options. these new QFT models were supposed to be better at
handling market volatility than the traditional schemes because they
had randomness and finite jumps "built into the theory from the start".

being a curious fellow, i decided to sit down for 3 sessions and see
what all the hub bub was about.

and i vainly sought for any physics while he tried to
convince me there was gold in them thar hills.

finally he figured out i was more interested in physics than in making
money on this, and we stopped meeting.

a few weeks ago i bumped into mr. financial math and we had a chat. i
asked if he ever got the codes up and running for the "theories" we had
discussed.  why yes, he answered, he found some really good programmer
to implement the models and now they are up and running and in place.
everything is good. so i asked, how could he tell if the models were
implemented "correctly", on what basis did he evaluate whether the
pricing on the options was "good" or "correct" or "optimal", whether it
handled market volatility any "better" than any other pricing scheme,
QFT-based, prayed-based, or otherwise.

he looked at me and gave me a nice big warm smile, and said, the codes
run and give the clients prices for options, and the clients still make
money and the codes are new, so all is good. when the clients tire of
these codes and think something else is needed to reinvigorate their
business (or profits, or whatever it is they do over there), they will
want other codes, and evaluate them similarly.

i'll leave you decide whether this is anything like a physical science
with the words changed.


Les

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to