Re: command and control, I suspect Osama has more resources than you infer.
Absent AQ, is there any conceivable reason the U.S. would want to bomb Pakistan? Who in their right mind would want to jump into that ultra- quagmire? It makes Vietnam look trivial. Re: JC, I did. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:11 PM To: Progressive Economics Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Somethin' happening here.... Max B. Sawicky wrote: > Money from Saudi Arabia, ops in Germany, but for all we know command > and control in Afghanistan and now Pakistan. What? Osama directing his agents during dialysis in a cave? Tom Clancy stuff, if you ask me. > It should be obvious that henceforth any U.S. administration will be > held accountable for another major attack and will strive mightily to > reduce its likelihood. Yes, that's the excuse for bombing civilians in Pakistan. > The campaign against 'political Islam' is economic and political, not > primarily military. Huh? Tell that to Juan Cole. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
