I agree with Terry's critique, but I would add that in the process 1 & 2 do get mixed together in very positive ways. The tragedy is that it does not happen more frequently.
Terry asked: The real problem here is collusion between students and faculty and administration. We do basically two jobs. 1. Produce and disseminate knowledge (or ideology), some of which involves interacting with undergraduates. 2. Credentialling (issuing middle class union cards). Thus students who have little interest in 1. can quite rationally spend lots of money and time pursuing 2. Since 1. and 2. are only tenuously connected, students can pursue 2. without learning much or anything and we can issue 2. to students who haven't learned much or anything. We consent to do 2. because it produces revenue which allows us to do 1. As a society we subsidize students to do 1. because it is useful and admirable. We subsidize students to do 2. because of the political influence of the middle class and because it would be unfair to overtly deny access to credentials to those without money. We know why we do 2. (see above). This is forgivable but not particularly defensible. The real question is why society bothers with it Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com 530 898 5321 fax 530 898 5901 _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
