Full at http://blog.cheapmotelsandahotplate.org.  This was on countrpunch, too, 
but I have added links in the blog post.

 

Economists never say much about work.  They talk about the supply of and the 
demand for labor, but they have very little to say about the nature of the work 
we do.  Like most commentators, they seem to believe that modern economies will 
require ever more skilled work, which will be done in clean and quiet 
workplaces, by educated workers, who will share in decision-making with 
managerial facilitators.  We should disabuse ourselves of such notions.  In the 
world today, the overwhelming majority of workers do hard and dangerous labor, 
risking the health of their bodies and minds every minute they toil.
 
The International Labor Organization (ILO), an agency of the United Nations, 
issued its Global Employment Trends this past January.  The report examines 
unemployment, poverty employment, and vulnerable employment.  The unemployed 
are those not working but actively searching for employment.  The working poor 
are those with jobs that do not provide above a threshold amount of money.  Two 
thresholds are used: $1.25 per day (in 2005 prices), which is “extreme 
poverty,” and $2.00 per day, which is just “poverty.”  People in vulnerable 
employment are the self-employed (called in the report “own-account” workers) 
and unpaid but working family members in the household of the self-employed.  
In most of the world, vulnerable employment is what is known as casual work; 
the workers who do this do not have formal arrangements with an employer, such 
as a labor contract with stipulated wages.  A man selling lottery tickets on a 
street corner, a woman hawking tamales in a parking lot, or a teenager offering 
rickshaw rides are examples of vulnerable employment.  A child helping her 
mother sell the tamales is an example of an unpaid family member doing 
vulnerable work.  In all countries, and especially in rich ones, not all 
self-employment is vulnerable.  However, in all countries, but mostly in poor 
ones, the vast majority of the self-employed are poor and vulnerable.
 
The ILO estimates the number of people in each of the three categories 
(unemployed, working poor, vulnerably employed) in 2009 under three scenarios.  
The deep economic downturn now afflicting most of the world has befuddled most 
economists, who neither saw it coming nor have been able to say how much worse 
it will get.  To compensate for the uncertainty enveloping the global economy, 
the ILO economists have made three estimates of the three labor market 
categories.  The details of the three “scenarios” are not important for our 
purposes.  But, given the severity of the “great recession” we are now 
experiencing, the deepest since the 1930s, the third or pessimistic scenario 
seems the most realistic.  Relief is nowhere in sight, especially for the 
world’s workers.
 
Here are the numbers for 2009, under the pessimistic scenario, for world 
unemployment, working poor, and vulnerable employment:
 
            Unemployment: 230 million (7.1 percent of a world labor force of 
about 3.24 billion)
Worki             Working Poor (using $2 per day as poverty threshold): 1.377 
billion (about 46 percent of total world employment of about three billion) 
            Vulnerable employment: 1.606 billion
 
 
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to