Good point, but could it be argued that the welfare state is more prodigious in 
every single European country than it is the US and as such the stabilizers 
steadying consumption would pull the EU out of recession before the US, 
notwithstanding the the dependence of the global economy on US consumption. 
Consumption, for instance a la Kalecki represents the principal macro variable 
that when it moves up, after we hit the trough, pulls with it all other 
variables, principally investment public and private. As such, would it not be 
that the Galbraith  aggregation   below could have missed: 1) the dynamics of 
macro variables are different in Europe than it is in the US, that is, because 
let us say, the underpinnings of consumption are different in view of more 
state dirigisme in Europe and probably a not so unified fiscal process and even 
the monetary one given that many countries have been monetising debts at 
different speeds, and; 2) the homogisation
 across Europe is not so complete to allow for such 'adding up' cum comparison 
despite resource mobility, that is inequality/poverty is both relative and 
absolute, meaning that in Europe regional disparities cannot be fully 
integrated and compared in view of the short period of integration, which, in 
turn, leaves  far too many qualitative differences unaccounted for. 
In respect to point 2), there is indeed a high rate of wage equalization 
(homoginising labour), but the starting point of some was too low to begin 
with, and the dislocation created by the process itself, i.e. a higher rate of 
reserve army of labour, makes a stronger point for European capital to depart 
from. 

 



________________________________
From: michael perelman <[email protected]>
To: Progressive Economics <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2009 12:09:16 AM
Subject: [Pen-l] European vs. U.S. Unemployment Explained

When Jaimie Galbraith is good, he can be very good. Here is an example, 
explaining European unemployment as a result of inequality rather than social 
democracy. After explaining the close association between inequality and 
unemployment, he goes on:


97: "The European economy is no longer a collection of separated national 
systems. Spain, Germany, and France are not independent, mutually isolated 
national economies. There are no barriers to trade or capital flow, in fact, no 
formal barriers to the movement of labor throughout Europe. There is now a 
single currency unit across most of the region. The integration of the European 
economy in practice -- from the standpoint of a large multinational corporate 
employer, for instance -- is nearly complete. From every analytical point of 
view, it is necessary to start thinking of Europe as a single unit. It is 
therefore necessary, from a statistical and practical point of view, to measure 
inequality and employment at the European, and not the national, level."

97: "When this is done, the notion of Europe and the United States at the 
opposite ends of an employment-equality spectrum disappears. Pay inequality 
within countries of Europe is relatively low, but inequalities between them are 
very high: much higher than across comparable distances in the United States. 
Adding the two components, the inequality within and the inequality between 
countries, one finds that overall inequalities of pay are actually higher in 
Europe than in the United States. Thus, the standard perception of a 
European/American counterpoint is simply incorrect. So far as pay is concerned, 
Europe now is both more unequal and less fully employed than the United States. 
It is, by the same token, less efficient, but not for the reasons usually 
given. Rather, the United States wins the efficiency contest -- not because it 
is less egalitarian but because it is more so than the ungainly ensemble of 
countries that now make up the European Union."

Galbraith, James K. 2008. The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the 
Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too (New York: Free Press).

-- Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l



      
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to