All of the above: state-owned, state-controlled, independent to a degree. I have been a guest on Press TV many times. Nobody tried to tell me what I could and couldn't say. Of course, they like Americans that are critical of the U.S. government. But they interview Americans who aren't leftists or so critical. If you disagree with the interviewer, they don't get mad and they invite you back. At least, that's been my experience. Of course, it's English-language, so as we all know, that's a different audience than if it were in Farsi.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, ken hanly<[email protected]> wrote: > > Does anyone know what the status of this website is? Is it state owned or > state controlled or is it independent to a degree. Skimming through the > articles it looks to follow official lines on the whole but in the comments > section it seems completely uncensored with scurrilous comments of all types > pro and anti Iran. > The following post gives a favorable impression of the Obama administration > but slams the US on privacy in general: > > http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=98852§ionid=3510203 > > US to drop satellite spying on Americans > Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:32:11 GMT > Font size : > > US spy satellite programs used for domestic security purposes are to be > terminated by the Obama administration. > The Obama Administration intends to put an end to a Bush-era program that > authorizes the use of US spy satellites for domestic security purposes. > > Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano plans to abandon the > controversial project, which was developed when the former President George > Bush was in office to give law enforcement an extra tool to fight > "terrorism", said a government official on Monday. > > "It's being shut down," said a homeland security official. > > Initiated in 2007, the program, which is called the National Applications > Office, was lambasted by advocates of civil liberty and privacy as they said > it would lead to domestic spying. > > While the Democrats have welcomed the closing of the program, some > Republicans remain skeptical, urging the project to be maintained. > > "If it is true, it's a very big mistake," said Peter King, who is the top > Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. "This is definitely a > step back in the war on terror." > > In the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks US statesmen began putting > together laws to further surveillance programs aimed at the American people. > The move drew great criticism on the part of civil liberty and privacy > supporters. > > According to Privacy International, in 2007 the United States had a privacy > index score of 1.5 (out of five possible points), which makes the US tied for > forty-first with Taiwan and Thailand out of forty seven countries > > > > > Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html > Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Robert Naiman Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
