Jim writes:

If I understand Shane correctly, I agree with him. The key thing is
that if the left pushed even harder for a better alternative (such as
single-payer) to the Obama/Congress plans rather than allying with
O/C, it would _weaken_ the right (all else constant).
===============================
I don't think this is the issue. Of course, the left should be pushing
single payer - in fact, pushing for socialized medicine, but the latter is
unfortunately not part of the public debate in present circumstances. In any
event, my impression is that most health care campaigners inside and outside
the Democratic party are already resolutely for single payer and are only
grudgingly accepting of an (authentic) "public option" in preference to no
reform at all.

The issue raised by Shane, as I understood it, was whether to rally and join
with those campaigners against the right-wing offensive, as Julio suggested,
or to ignore them and the counter-campaign of the right in favour of public
criticism of the Obama administration.

Based on my own experience in other settings - and I'm certain this is true
of most everyone on the list - criticism of a leadership's failed policy and
strategy is both necessary and possible, but is only effective when it
occurs within the context of a struggle rather than outside of it. From here
it seems to be as though the town hall meetings served as the focal point of
that struggle, and for anyone on the left to have gone to those meetings and
joined in the clamour against the DP politicians who were coming under fire
from the right, rather than taking on the right's arguments against any form
of public health care, would have been suicidal in terms of working with the
liberal constituencies whose political consciousness the left has always
tried to further develop.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to