David, you are correct.  I only hope that you apply the same standards to 
Chicago, which absolutely lets itself be budged by empirical evidence.

This is from an article I am preparing:

In fact, the Chicago style of economics is famous for rejecting empirical 
evidence out of hand. Deirdre McCloskey, a former Chicago faculty member, 
recounted how people who used data that called the theory into question 
would "be met by choruses of 'I can't believe it' or 'It doesn't make 
sense'." Milton Friedman's own Money Workshop at Chicago in the late 1960s 
and the early 1970s was a case in point" (McCloskey 1985, p. 140). Melvin 
Reder, another Chicago faculty member, offered further insight in the way 
that Chicago refuses to give ground in the face of evidence that calls the 
micro-foundations into question: 

  ##Chicago economists tend strongly to appraise their own research and 
that of others by a standard that requires [inter alia] that the findings 
of empirical research be consistent with the implications of standard price 
theory .... The major objective is to convert non economists to their way 
of thinking .... However imaginative, answers that violate any maintained 
hypothesis of the paradigm, are penalized as evincing failure to absorb 
training. [Reder 1982, pp. 13, 18, and 19] 

 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 
07:04:05PM -0700, David B. Shemano wrote:
> Because of the complexity of national economies, arguing that a macroeconomic 
> economic theory is true "all other things held equal" is like asking Mrs. 
> Lincoln how she liked the play, other than the shooting.  I remain fascinated 
> and puzzled how economics fits into the science paradigm of testable 
> hypothesis, etc., and whether the presentation of empirical evidence has 
> much, if any, influence on economists' preconceived positions.
> 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to