Greetings PEN-Lers,



As Dan Scanlan pointed out, Ralph Nader is doing it, how are you? 
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/09/19 
 
By "it," I'm talking about art. Doug has a great radio show and the rest of you 
are very very sharp and funny writers. Might one of you be interested in this?



I am editing a special edition of the international, peer-reviewed journal, 
Policy Futures in Education with the theme, "The Art of Public Pedagogy: 
Should the 'Truth' Dazzle gradually or Thunder Mightily?" If you are interested 
in writing on this topic please send me a 500 word abstract of your idea. 

 

To learn more about the theme, see description at end of message below. To 
learn more about the journal, see: 

http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pfie/

 

DEADLINE for proposals: October 15, 2009

Notification of Acceptance: October 22, 2009

First Draft Due: January 10, 2010

Review Completed: February 20, 2010

Final Article Due: April 15, 2010

 
Brief Background: The Handbook of Public Pedagogy

Critical Pedagogy theorists are doing groundbreaking work on the theme of 
"public intellectual," including "public anthropology."  This coming December 
2009 Routledge will release this state of the art publication, “The Handbook of 
Public Pedagogy. To learn more, review the contents.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:BWLK8wZaOqsJ:www.routledgeeducation.com/books/Handbook-of-Public-Pedagogy-isbn9780415801263+Critical+Public+Pedagogy&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 


Brief Background: The Handbook
 of Public Pedagogy

Critical Pedagogy theorists are doing groundbreaking work on the theme of 
"public intellectual," including "public anthropology."  This coming December 
2009 Routledge will release this state of the art publication, “The Handbook of 
Public Pedagogy. To learn more, review the contents.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:BWLK8wZaOqsJ:www.routledgeeducation.com/books/Handbook-of-Public-Pedagogy-isbn9780415801263+Critical+Public+Pedagogy&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

Best,

Brian McKenna, Ph.D.

University of Michigan-Dearborn

 

Description of theme: "The Art of Public Pedagogy: Should the 'Truth' Dazzle 
Gradually or Thund er Mightily?"Tactics, Risks and Possibilities

 

In this special edition of Policy Futures in Education, we invite scholars, 
social scientists, artists, journalists and/or self-described critical 
pedagogues to submit a 500 word abstract describing the place of art in your 
public pedagogy work. All communication is art in the broadest conception of 
the term. “Art” is open to your interpretation, but you must cite the 
literature to defend your use of the concept as you apply it. The article must 
also discuss the form of your intervention (radio, film, journalism, community 
partnership, civic engagement, music, drama, agitprop and so on), how your 
intervention is or was artistic, the reasons why you employed “art,” the 
culture, resources and power dimensions of your expression and any conflicts 
you experienced. 

 

“Art is not a mirror held up to reality,=2
0but a hammer with which to shape it.” So wrote dramatist Bertolt Brecht in the 
1930s. The Weavers’ folk group lyricist Lee Hayes took that hammer in the 1950s 
and imagined (along with Pete Seeger) what that world would look like “If I had 
a hammer. . .” 

 

How do you use art? As a hammer? As a mirror? As a device to dramatize reality 
to grab the reader's attention? How does art help us with our counter-education 
to the dominant hegemony? 

 

Today, amidst the increasing corporate takeover of higher education, journalism 
and entertainment – and the growing exclusion of critical voices – social 
change activists, artists -- and increasingly, academics – are wrestling with 
how to resist the “terror of neoliberalism,” which has become the culture’s 
dominant public pedagogy.

  

In response, a growing critical public pedagogy movement – influenced by the 
Brazilian educator Paulo Freire (see his Pedagogy of the Oppressed 1970) is 
working to empower citizens by addressing “the relationship between politics 
and agency, knowledge and power, subject positions and values, and learning and 
social change” (Giroux 2010), and by taking their pedagogy directly to the 
public through a wide variety of forms. Unsatisfied with simply communicating 
critical understandings, the public pedagogy movement seeks to “expose human 
misery and eliminate the conditions that produce it (Giroux 2010).” There is 
growing recognition that we must
 take subaltern messages directly to the public, using the forms, tactics, 
referential contexts and yes, artistry, of good communicators.

 

Some would say that art is a form of resistance since it seeks to reinterpret 
reality, engage it in controversy.  It is not only a tool used as a critique, 
but should also be future oriented, giving us a hopeful sense of what can be. 
It speaks to the “not yet.” The art of public pedagogy may include a vision of 
the future, a vision of a reorganized political economy, and a model for 
democratizing and liberating discourse.  

 

Public education often is a performance in the sense that participants are 
allowed to change roles and act as if they had power and in this sense it is 
performance.  In the process of acting/performance people may become empowered 
and see their performance as the possibility of power.

&nbs p;

It is important to define how neoliberalism is educative and how it terrorizes 
people. Neoliberalism is capitalism with the gloves off. It is a perilous 
geography in which the social state has been carved out in deference to the 
military state. It is an attack on everything public and collective. Neoliberal 
hegemony tends to exclude, ignore or suppress frank discussions of capitalism 
and/or domination. Neoliberalism celebrates cruelty and dismisses compassion. 
As a result, democracy, as an ideal and a practice, is in great peril. 

 

How frank should one be about issues of capitalism, revolution, class analysis
? This fundamental issue has a great deal of influence on one’s use of 
aesthetics. For example, Village Voice writer Jack Newfield was of the opinion 
that in educating the public a writer must “Let the truth dazzle gradually.” 
One must draw them in slowly and not hammer them over the head, he believed. 
Similarly, Mary Beth Doyle, an environmental activist and agitprop practitioner 
with Ann Arbor’s Ecology Center noted that, “It’s less important to tell the 
truth than to have the truth be heard.” Anthropologist and novelist Kurt 
Vonnegut agreed, viewing a writing project as little more than a belabored “one 
liner.” Pull them in first and then catch them at the end.

 

The populist filmmaker Michael Moore, in his soon to be released film 
"Capitalism: A Love Story” will use humor as an artistic device to make some 
direct charges against the neoliberal establishment, a strategy from which many 
can learn. Still, Moore’s intervention will only be effective public pedagogy 
if it can inspire citizens to critical action. 

 

Like Moore contributors must describe how their work publicly challenges 
domination. In addition to that (and unlike Moore) you are asked to carefully 
reflect on your theories and uses of art in your public pedagogy. And then you 
are asked to explicitly share that critical reflection as a scholar. 

 

Thank you.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to