On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, c b <[email protected]> wrote:
> There has been insufficient appreciation of the positive role that
> shorters played in this story. They were the ones that effectively brought
> the speculative party to an end. By dumping bonds and buying up credit
> default swaps on the sick financial giants' debt, in addition to shorting
> their stock, the shorters made it impossible for these companies to
> continue their reckless ways.
>
> Of course the shorters were not trying to perform a public service. They
> were trying to make money. However, in pursuing profits, they did what the
> Fed failed to do: they brought the dangerous inflation of a housing bubble
> to an end.



It is a bit surprising to see Dean Baker write in praise of
speculators. That said, how does Baker's theory explain the mysterious
absence of short-sellers earlier in the bubble cycle? In other words,
how did these insightful people allow the bubble to inflate to such
monstrous proportions in the first place?
-raghu.



-- 
"As a matter of fact, no, I don't have a life."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to