from Edward Bellamy, LOOKING BACKWARD: 2000-1887 (publ. 1888),
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/BELLAMY/ch01.html

> By way of attempting to give the reader some general impression of the way 
> people lived together in those days [when capitalism (not his word) reigned], 
> and especially of the relations of the rich and poor to one another, perhaps 
> I cannot do better than to compare society as it then was to a prodigious 
> coach which the masses of humanity were harnessed to and dragged toilsomely 
> along a very hilly and sandy road. The driver was hunger, and permitted no 
> lagging, though the pace was necessarily very slow. Despite the difficulty of 
> drawing the coach at all along so hard a road, the top was covered with 
> passengers who never got down, even at the steepest ascents. These seats on 
> top were very breezy and comfortable. Well up out of the dust, their 
> occupants could enjoy the scenery at their leisure, or critically discuss the 
> merits of the straining team. Naturally such places were in great demand and 
> the competition for them was keen, every one seeking as the first end in life 
> to secure a seat on the coach for himself and to leave it to his child after 
> him. By the rule of the coach a man could leave his seat to whom he wished, 
> but on the other hand there were many accidents by which it might at any time 
> be wholly lost. For all that they were so easy, the seats were very insecure, 
> and at every sudden jolt of the coach persons were slipping out of them and 
> falling to the ground, where they were instantly compelled to take hold of 
> the rope and help to drag the coach on which they had before ridden so 
> pleasantly. It was naturally regarded as a terrible misfortune to lose one's 
> seat, and the apprehension that this might happen to them or their friends 
> was a constant cloud upon the happiness of those who rode.

> But did they think only of themselves? you ask. Was not their very luxury 
> rendered intolerable to them by comparison with the lot of their brothers and 
> sisters in the harness, and the knowledge that their own weight added to 
> their toil? Had they no compassion for fellow beings from whom fortune only 
> distinguished them? Oh, yes; commiseration was frequently expressed by those 
> who rode for those who had to pull the coach, especially when the vehicle 
> came to a bad place in the road, as it was constantly doing, or to a 
> particularly steep hill. At such times, the desperate straining of the team, 
> their agonized leaping and plunging under the pitiless lashing of hunger, the 
> many who fainted at the rope and were trampled in the mire, made a very 
> distressing spectacle, which often called forth highly creditable displays of 
> feeling on the top of the coach. At such times the passengers would call down 
> encouragingly to the toilers of the rope, exhorting them to patience, and 
> holding out hopes of possible compensation in another world for the hardness 
> of their lot, while others contributed to buy salves and liniments for the 
> crippled and injured. It was agreed that it was a great pity that the coach 
> should be so hard to pull, and there was a sense of general relief when the 
> specially bad piece of road was gotten over. This relief was not, indeed, 
> wholly on account of the team, for there was always some danger at these bad 
> places of a general overturn in which all would lose their seats.

> It must in truth be admitted that the main effect of the spectacle of the 
> misery of the toilers at the rope was to enhance the passengers' sense of the 
> value of their seats upon the coach, and to cause them to hold on to them 
> more desperately than before. If the passengers could only have felt assured 
> that neither they nor their friends would ever fall from the top, it is 
> probable that, beyond contributing to the funds for liniments and bandages, 
> they would have troubled themselves extremely little about those who dragged 
> the coach.

> I am well aware that this will appear to the men and women of the twentieth 
> century [when Bellamy's utopia was presumed to prevail] an incredible 
> inhumanity, but there are two facts, both very curious, which partly explain 
> it. In the first place, it was firmly and sincerely believed that there was 
> no other way in which Society could get along, except the many pulled at the 
> rope and the few rode, and not only this, but that no very radical 
> improvement even was possible, either in the harness, the coach, the roadway, 
> or the distribution of the toil. It had always been as it was, and it always 
> would be so. It was a pity, but it could not be helped, and philosophy 
> forbade wasting compassion on what was beyond remedy.

> The other fact is yet more curious, consisting in a singular hallucination 
> which those on the top of the coach generally shared, that they were not 
> exactly like their brothers and sisters who pulled at the rope, but of finer 
> clay, in some way belonging to a higher order of beings who might justly 
> expect to be drawn. This seems unaccountable, but, as I once rode on this 
> very coach and shared that very hallucination, I ought to be believed. The 
> strangest thing about the hallucination was that those who had but just 
> climbed up from the ground, before they had outgrown the marks of the rope 
> upon their hands, began to fall under its influence. As for those whose 
> parents and grand-parents before them had been so fortunate as to keep their 
> seats on the top, the conviction they cherished of the essential difference 
> between their sort of humanity and the common article was absolute. The 
> effect of such a delusion in moderating fellow feeling for the sufferings of 
> the mass of men into a distant and philosophical compassion is obvious. To it 
> I refer as the only extenuation I can offer for the indifference which, at 
> the period I write of, marked my own attitude toward the misery of my 
> brothers.  <
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to