raghu wrote:
Like broken clocks, even White House talking point are occasionally
right. In particular, maybe you can explain why the following is
wrong:
"What do you imagine would happen if premiums turned out to be
unaffordable—even with hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies?
Would Congress enforce the mandate for individuals to buy insurance,
or ease it? Would Congress keep subsidies at the same level, or make
them more generous? Would Congress play nice with insurers, or add a
public option? History teaches that, once in place, entitlement
programs tend to become more generous, not less. The approach to
programs that do not work as intended is to lubricate their operations
as Congress does best—by spending more money. This is a cause for
concern about the Senate bill, but not among liberals."
Sure. It accepts the rules of the game dictated by the capitalist
class. My position is that their heads should be chopped off.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
