http://www.grist.org/article/the-public-supports-better-policy-on-climate-change-than-corporate-environm
Tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/InfNotPric

The public supports better policy on climate change than corporate
environmentalists
Gar W. Lipow 9 Mar 2010 1:53 PM

Last week I documented that the public supports trains and auto
efficiency standards and renewable requirements, along with other
policies sometimes slandered as "command & control" over emissions
pricing. (http://tinyurl.com/CCpopular)  This week: some historical
perspective on why the public is right, and mainstream environmental
groups are wrong.

Historically U.S. infrastructure, the basis on which this nation
developed, was never some magical response to supply and demand.

The Erie Canal would not have been built without rights of way given
away to the builders. Land given to homesteaders and farmers made us
one of the world's great farming nations. Railroads were built because
the great railway companies were granted land a mile out from their
tracks to compensate for construction costs.  Or think of the
telegraph, one of the first types of public infrastructure to receive
not only grants of rights of way, but massive direct public cash
subsidies. And it is worth remembering that none of this was built on
empty land; American Indians were slaughtered or driven away for every
one of these things.  Much of the work on that stolen land was done by
slaves. I can't imagine a "green tax" that could have compensated for
that.

And that is not something that ended in the 19th century. Airports and
water ports are mostly built with public funds and mostly built on
public land and water.  Utilities use public rights of way. Water
pipes and sewer pipes, electricity lines, gas lines, old school phone
lines, broad band fiber optic lines, television, radio, cell phone,
and other wireless spectra all use public resources and are often
built with public money. Any transport more advanced than a deer path
also depends on right of way grants.  Not just trains, but
automobiles, bikes. Even walking paths need some construction and
maintenance.

Any society that needs infrastructure more complicated than that built
by hunter-gatherers will need public involvement, whatever "public"
means in that particular society.

Read the rest here:
http://www.grist.org/article/the-public-supports-better-policy-on-climate-change-than-corporate-environm
Tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/InfNotPric
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to