The New York Times March 25, 2010
Op-Ed Contributors
Too-Busy Bees
By MARCELO AIZEN and LAWRENCE HARDER

IN the past five years, as the phenomenon known as colony-collapse 
disorder has spread across the United States and Europe, causing the 
disappearance of whole colonies of domesticated honeybees, many people 
have come to fear that our food supply is in peril. The news on 
Wednesday that a Department of Agriculture survey found that American 
honeybees had died in great numbers this winter can only add to such fears.

The truth, fortunately, is not nearly so dire. But it is more complicated.

There is good news: While some areas are seeing a shortage of bees, 
globally the number of domesticated honeybee colonies is increasing. The 
bad news is that this increase can’t keep up with our growing appetite 
for luxury foods that depend heavily on bee pollination. The 
domesticated honeybee isn’t the only pollinator that agriculture relies 
on — wild bees also play a significant role, and we seem intent on 
destroying their habitats.

To understand the problem, we need to understand the extent of the 
honeybee’s role in agriculture. Humans certainly benefit from the way 
bees — and to a lesser extent, other pollinators like flies, beetles and 
butterflies — help plants produce fruits and seeds. Agriculture, 
however, is not as dependent on pollinators as one might think. It’s 
true that some crops like raspberries, cashews, cranberries and mangoes 
cannot reproduce without pollinators. But crops like sugar cane and 
potatoes, grown for their stems or tubers, can be propagated without 
pollination. And the crops that provide our staple carbohydrates — 
wheat, rice and corn — are either wind-pollinated or self-pollinated. 
These don’t need bees at all.

Overall, about one-third of our worldwide agricultural production 
depends to some extent on bee pollination, but less than 10 percent of 
the 100 most productive crop species depend entirely on it. If 
pollinators were to vanish, it would reduce total food production by 
only about 6 percent.

This wouldn’t mean the end of human existence, but if we want to 
continue eating foods like apples and avocados, we need to understand 
that bees and other pollinators can’t keep up with the current growth in 
production of these foods.

The reason is that fruit and seed crops that are most dependent on 
pollinators yield relatively little food per acre, and therefore take up 
an inordinate, and increasing, amount of land. The fraction of 
agriculture dependent on pollination has increased by 300 percent in 
half a century.

The paradox is that our demand for these foods endangers the wild bees 
that help make their cultivation possible. The expansion of farmland 
destroys wild bees’ nesting sites and also wipes out the wildflowers 
that the bees depend on when food crops aren’t in blossom. Researchers 
in Britain and the Netherlands have found that the diversity of wild bee 
species in most regions in those countries has declined since 1980. This 
decrease was mostly due to the loss of bees that require very particular 
habitats — bees that couldn’t adapt after losing their homes and food 
sources to cultivation. Similarly, between 1940 and 1960, as land 
increasingly came under cultivation in the American Midwest, several 
bumblebee species disappeared from the area. It is difficult to count 
and keep track of wild bee populations globally, but their numbers are 
probably declining overall as a result of such human activity.

Even if the number of wild pollinators remained stable, it would not be 
sufficient to meet the increasing demand for agricultural pollination. 
Could domesticated bees take up the slack? By looking at data from the 
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, we found that 
the number of managed honeybee hives increased by 45 percent during the 
past five decades.

Unfortunately, this increase cannot counteract the growing demand for 
pollination or the shortage of wild pollinators. Domesticated bees 
mainly produce honey; any contribution they make to crop pollination is 
usually a secondary benefit. In most parts of the world, they provide 
pollination only locally and not necessarily where it is needed most.

Thus a vicious cycle: Fewer pollinating bees reduce yield per acre — and 
lower yield requires cultivation of more land to produce the same amount 
of food.

Eventually, a growing shortage of pollinators will limit what foods 
farmers can produce. If we want to continue to enjoy almonds, apples and 
avocados, we have to cultivate fewer of them, more sustainably, and 
protect the wild bees that help make their production possible.

Marcelo Aizen is a researcher at the National Scientific and Technical 
Research Council of Argentina. Lawrence Harder is a professor of 
pollination ecology at the University of Calgary.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to