Bullets from the Drug War
To: [email protected]

by Dmitry Orlov

ClubOrlov (March 24 2010)




* The US has lost the "War on Drugs"

* The losing side is usually not the one to decide when a fight is over or
how it ends

* Unlike other recent defeats, this lost war is a defeat followed by an
invasion

* Mexico is the natural staging area for the invasion (inconvenient though
it is for the Mexicans)

* New franchises are being set up to service the North American drug
market (which is the biggest in the world)

* The CIA has to eat, and all they know how to do competently is run guns
and drugs and control thugs; they get a seat at the table

* The narcs have to eat too, and all they are trained to do is deal (with)
drugs; they get a seat at the table too

* As the federales grow weak in the US and Mexico, the battle lines will
advance north of the border, leaving Mexico a quiet and largely intact
backwater

* This is an inter-US conflict, because Americans are the most avid
consumers, sellers, and prosecutors of drugs

* Life in the USA gives everyone a pain that is for many people simply not
survivable without drugs: either alcohol, pharmaceuticals or illegal drugs

* Illegal drugs are far more cost-effective than either pharma or alcohol
- government-licensed industries which are either excessively lucrative or
taxed heavily

* As Americans give up hope, they will need to self-medicate in
ever-larger numbers

* They will be far more able financially to afford illegal drugs than
either pharma or alcohol.

* Illegal drugs (and moonshine) are two very large post-collapse
enrepreneurial opportunities within the fUSA/???? [Orlov 2005]

* This is no longer a war against drugs; it is now a contest between
alternative drug distribution systems

* One alternative is a centralized, paramilitary organization run by CIA
remnants, former military, and former police

* Another alternative is ethnic mafias, which will diversify into many
other kinds of trade.

* The third, nautrally most cost-effective alternative will be provided by
informal, local distribution networks based on barter, which will be all
that is left once the dust settles

* The downside of all this is that it will be hard to find anyone sober
enough to operate a light switch

* The upside to that is that the national electrical grid goes away, so
there will be very little demand for competent light switch operators

http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2010/03/bullets-from-drug-war.html
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to