NY Times May 3, 2010
For Obama, a Nonstop Juggling Act
By JACKIE CALMES

President Obama’s spokesman promised for a second day on Monday 
that the administration would “keep our boot on the throat of BP” 
to get the company to resolve the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. 
Yet, hours later, the president was hosting dinner at the White 
House with executives of the Business Council. Among the companies 
represented by the corporate club: BP.

Those kinds of cross currents have become a hallmark of Mr. 
Obama’s presidency.

Governing in a time of prolonged economic crisis, he seeks to 
balance his oft-professed regard for the free market and the 
job-creating potential of big business against the need to respond 
to the angry populism of voters on the left and right convinced 
that corporate America — whether banks or mine owners or oil 
companies — has only its own interests at heart.

 From the time he took office, Mr. Obama’s juggling has made for a 
shifting and sometimes inconsistent record of rhetoric and policy. 
He has mixed, for example, condemnation of “Wall Street greed” 
with opposition to government caps on financiers’ bonuses, and 
criticism of oil companies’ profits with a recent call (now in 
abeyance) to expand offshore drilling.

It is enough to give rise to the equally contradictory criticisms 
he endures, from longtime enemies on the right crying socialism 
and from disillusioned supporters on the left who lament what they 
see as Mr. Obama’s pro-business bias.

By his own reckoning, Mr. Obama has always been hard to peg 
ideologically. His Republican opponents charge that he is masking 
a left-wing agenda in centrist-sounding words.

His supporters, including those who work for him, say he is a 
pragmatist whose instincts are genuinely centrist, both as a 
matter of politics and style. The expression about a boot on BP’s 
throat, for example, would be atypical of Mr. Obama; his 
spokesman, Robert Gibbs, expropriated the colorful imagery from 
Ken Salazar, the interior secretary.

“The president calls it as he sees it,” said the senior adviser 
Valerie Jarrett, Mr. Obama’s liaison to the business community. 
“He’s not calibrating his responses politically, seeking favor 
from the left or the right.”

Ms. Jarrett as well as Mr. Obama and his economic team were dining 
Monday night at the White House with the Business Council’s 
13-member executive committee, which includes the chief executives 
of Exxon Mobil, JPMorgan Chase, Aetna, WellPoint, Dow Chemical, 
Boeing and Bechtel Group. BP’s chief executive, Tony Hayward, who 
is not on the executive committee but is a member of the council, 
did not attend, according to a White House official.

While the economy is much improved from when Mr. Obama took 
office, his agenda and external events continue to demand 
engagement with big business even as he seeks to represent the 
interests and complaints of average Americans and small 
businesses. Yet as is often the case in striking a middle ground, 
those on either side remain unsatisfied.

In swearing to recover every last dime the government spends on 
BP’s spill, Mr. Obama is reflecting the pain of bailout-weary 
taxpayers. And fighting in recent weeks for Senate passage of a 
bill tightening regulation of the financial system, he has 
demanded a new overseer to protect consumers — over banks’ 
vehement opposition — even as he has sought business support for 
the legislation by arguing that he has been warding off much more 
stringent regulations from his party’s left.

For all of Mr. Obama’s differences with business leaders, “they’ll 
tell you they’ve never had a better direct relationship with any 
president,” said Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff.

For Mr. Emanuel and other veterans of the Clinton administration, 
Mr. Obama’s tricky navigation between business and populism 
recalls the forces that buffeted Bill Clinton early in his 
administration, as the nation emerged from a much less severe 
recession. To the chagrin of the liberals who helped elect him, 
Mr. Clinton pursued a centrist agenda of deficit reduction and 
free trade — though not always happily.

“Where are all the Democrats?” he once lashed out at his advisers, 
angry at not being able to keep his promises for domestic 
investments. “I hope you’re all aware we’re all Eisenhower 
Republicans.”

“Growing up in Arkansas, Clinton could do the antibusiness 
populism riff better than anybody,” said William A. Galston, a 
former Clinton policy adviser. “He had that in his bones. But he 
decided not to pursue that approach.”

But, Mr. Galston added, “he was able to do that in part because 
anger against business was not nearly as intense in that period as 
President Obama faces.”

Mr. Clinton, too, took heat from his left. The failure of 
disillusioned liberals to vote in the 1994 midterm elections was a 
factor in Democrats’ losing their Congressional majorities — the 
fallout that Democrats fear now.

But perhaps because Mr. Obama inherited the worst economic 
downturn since the Depression, he has drawn more complaints than 
Mr. Clinton ever did that he is no Franklin Roosevelt — in policy 
or rhetoric.

Roosevelt is celebrated by liberals for denouncing “economic 
royalists” and “unscrupulous moneychangers.” Yet his 
administration in 1933 also created an organization to attract 
businesses’ advice on measures to pull out of the Depression. That 
group still exists: it has evolved into the Business Council.

And just as Mr. Obama has ratcheted up his own populist attacks 
against corporate self-interest and Wall Street’s return to 
business as usual, so did Roosevelt become more vocally populist 
as re-election neared and he faced demagogic opposition. That 
included the likes of Senator Huey Long of Louisiana, the radio 
broadcaster Father Charles Coughlin and a domestic Communist Party 
making inroads on the left, much like the Tea Party movement today 
on the far right.

Still, Mr. Obama hardly seems likely to go as far as Roosevelt, 
who at one point swore to a top aide that he would “steal Long’s 
thunder.”

In a recent interview, Mr. Obama acknowledged that Wall Street 
executives had not heeded his call to reform themselves “as much 
as I’d like.” But given an opening to excoriate them, he said 
instead, “You don’t want to paint with too broad a brush.”
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to