Jamie James's The Snake Charmer
by Louis Proyect
Book Review

     The Snake Charmer: a Life and Death in the Pursuit of Knowledge, by 
Jamie James, Hyperion Books, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-1-4013-0213-9, 260 pages.

(Swans - May 31, 2010)   Last January, while idly channel-surfing on my 
television set, I stumbled across a show titled Venom in Vegas that 
featured snake expert Donald Schultz spending 10 days in a glass box 
with 100 venomous and constrictor snakes. Schultz is from South Africa, 
where he competes with fellow snake handler and countryman Austin 
Stevens for publicity.

In 1986 Stevens pulled off a similar stunt in the name of generating 
awareness about gorillas, an endangered species. He set a Guinness World 
record by spending 107 days and nights in a cage with 36 of the most 
dangerous African snakes. On the 96th day, he was bitten by a cobra, but 
refused to leave the cage after being treated with anti-venom.

Of course the most notorious of these snake handlers was the Australian 
Steve Irwin who died in 2006 after being stung in the heart by an aptly 
named stingray. Unlike Schultz and Stevens, Austin handled all sorts of 
poisonous creatures, including the ocean-dwelling stingray.

After finding my curiosity jogged by Schultz's stunt (an excerpt is 
here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARzK6Y48scI), I decided to read a 
book about the late Joe Slowinski that came out in 2008. Titled The 
Snake Charmer: a Life and Death in Pursuit of Knowledge and written by 
Jamie James, it tells the rather sad story of a legitimate scientist -- 
rather than a showman -- who was bitten by a many-banded krait in 
September 2001 during an expedition in Burma, just before the WTC 
attacks. The many-banded krait's venom is rated 16 times more powerful 
than a cobra's. Slowinski died right around the time the buildings 
collapsed.

Although I am by no means fixated on poisonous snakes, I do find myself 
drawn to exceptional human beings, particularly those with tragic flaws. 
That described Joe Slowinski to a T. A July 13, 2008 review of James's 
book accentuated the dark side:

     No matter how hard James tries to make Slowinski sound roguishly 
charming, how often he mentions his "disarming, gap-toothed smile," how 
earnestly he swears in the epilogue that he sorely feels the loss of 
someone he never met, I could not help reading between the lines: 
intentionally or not, he makes his subject sound like a Class A jerk.

     It isn't Slowinski's redneck genius persona -- meeting academy 
donors in a baggy T-shirt, smuggling reptiles without permits, kicking 
down his own door to impress a date when he forgets his keys. That was 
just snake shtick. Nor is it his earlier "starving graduate student my 
work is everything" ethos, even when he shouts at his not-well-off 
father for offering to buy him a table so they don't have to eat while 
sitting on the stairs. Nor is it the poses James puts him in: the boy 
Hercules, age 5, brandishing a rat snake "as thick as his own little 
arm," or the carnival man dazzling Burmese villagers just before his 
death, the sun "glinting penny-bright" on his goatee as he "free-handled 
the dangerous serpent they called ngan taw kyar ('royal tiger snake') 
with cool bravado."

     Rather, it's his ruthlessness. His toying with snakes while drunk, 
terrifying friends. His treatment of his only long-term girlfriend, whom 
he dumps over the phone. His theft of the prize specimens of a Brazilian 
herpetologist; caught with her snakes dead in his freezer, he blames the 
language barrier, claiming he thought she'd granted permission. And the 
coup de grace is his final, fatal blunder. Relying on bribes and 
half-truths, he smuggles an expedition of 16 scientists and 130 porters 
into one of the most remote and malarial corners of the world without 
official permission or a doctor -- just a first-aid kit so meager it 
wouldn't have served a Boy Scout camp-out.

While all of reviewer Donald G. McNeil Jr.'s points are true, he leaves 
out the more admirable sides of Joe Slowinski, not the least of which is 
a dedication to the pursuit of knowledge. In an era of creationist 
obfuscation and backwardness, it is necessary to pay tribute to 
Slowinski as someone totally dedicated to evolutionary science.

full: http://www.swans.com/library/art16/lproy61.html
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to