On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gar,
>        Yes I was offering Makani power as an alternative to the flying 
> helicopter tethered at 33,000 feet.  That's a long string, and frankly it 
> seems farcical.

Not really that hard to achieve. Kevlar cable surrounding and
supporting aluminum transmission was possible decades ago.  I suspect
modern materials can do better, though the comparatively low cost
compared to more advanced materials may be worth the 20% power loss in
transmission to the ground.


Well maybe as low as 10,000. But either way modern materials can handle it.
>
> Gene
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Gar Lipow wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Gar,
>>>        What seems like a more practical variation of this technology is 
>>> described in The New Yorker of May 17, 2010.
>>
>>
>> I searched the New Yorker to see what was described in that issue. OK
>> you are talking about Makani power, one type of kite or flying wing.
>> The best description I know of this offhand is from Saul Griffith's
>> TED talk 
>> http://locavolt.com/energy/power-generation/wind/kite-generators/74/makani-power-high-altitude-power-kites,'
>>
>> Several problems with this
>>
>> 1) He only expects to get up to 2,000 feet.  Less power. So unless his
>> costs are substantially less than with the "tethered helicopters" you
>> will end up with higher costs per kWh.
>>
>> 2) less mature tech. Still developing the steering mechanism. Being
>> unpowered, the kite/flying wing is tricky to steer. With tethered
>> helicopters we know how to steer the damn thing.  (Yes, even staying
>> in place takes some steering. And the "kite" idea is based on not
>> really staying in placing but constantly circleing or swooping.
>>
>> On the other hand, maybe you meant the Pedicab from the same issue.
>> Which I have to admit is a far more mature technology than either kind
>> of flying energy generator.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pen-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to