Robert Naiman wrote:
> Rangel - cited below - has a primary opponent in the form of economic
> justice advocate Jonathan Tasini, who has also spoken out on Gaza.
> This would seem like an ideal talking point for Tasini...
> 

 From his website. It may be just me, but I found this to be a 
bunch of pap.

Israel-Palestinian Conflict

At the heart of the conflict in the Middle East is the 
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Unlike virtually all American 
politicians running for public office who express their position 
on the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, Jonathan’s views on the 
issue come from a deep, personal connection and experience.

Jonathan’s father was born in Palestine and fought in the Israeli 
underground. Jonathan lived in Israel for seven years, during 
which he was involved, as a teen-ager and young man, in the 
fledgling peace movement. He went through the 1973 Yom Kippur war, 
and one of his cousin’s was killed in the war and that cousin’s 
brother was wounded. Half of Jonathan’s family lives in Israel, 
some within a few miles of the West Bank border.

So, it is absolutely clear to Jonathan that only a two-state 
solution will end the violence that has taken so many Palestinian 
and Israeli lives--and bring stability and peace to the Middle East.

Jonathan unequivocally supports the creation of a Palestinian 
state in the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip, consequently 
ending Israeli occupation of these areas because such a solution 
is the only way to ensure Israeli security. The current situation 
in Gaza is intolerable and unconscionable.

The final peace settlement has to accommodate Israel’s security 
requirements but it also has to ensure a viable, thriving, 
independent Palestinian State which has territorial contiguity and 
is not broken into cantons.

Jonathan also lived in Jerusalem and still remembers what a 
beautiful city it is. Its special nature, though, is the role it 
plays in the spiritual lives of Judaism, Islam and Christianity. A 
negotiated settlement must include a plan that allows Israelis and 
Palestinians to share the city because Palestinians make up 
one-third of the city’s residents and have historic and 
long-standing political, economic, and religious ties to the city. 
A Palestinian capital in Arab areas of Jerusalem will not threaten 
the city’s role as the capital of Israel.

Violence is not the answer for either side. The 
Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be resolved via negotiated, 
non-violent means. Both peoples have suffered from the bloodshed. 
Yet, clear majorities of both peoples say they want a peaceful 
settlement of the conflict. A credible negotiating track, linked 
with a bi-lateral effort to ensure security and stop the violence, 
is the only path to a long-lasting settlement. “Credible” means 
that everyone must have a seat at the table.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to