At least before he tears into environmentalists.

Epstein, Richard A. 2010. "BP Doesn't Deserve a Liability Cap: The best 
way to deter future spills is to expose drillers to the full costs of 
any mistake and not let any company without proper insurance near an oil 
derrick." Wall Street Journal (16 June).
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298902528808996.html?mod=WSJASIA_hps_sections_opinion

"What's needed going forward is a comprehensive legal strategy that 
addresses the risks though a combination of regulation before the fact 
and tort liability (and criminal sanctions where appropriate) 
afterwards. Tort remedies are essential to protect people (and their 
property) who do not have contractual relations with defendants from 
harms such as air and water pollution. The legal system should never 
allow self-interested parties to keep for themselves all the gains from 
dangerous activities that unilaterally impose losses on others -- which 
is why the most devout defender of laissez-faire must insist, not just 
concede, that tough medicine is needed in these cases. The fundamental 
question here is one of technique: What mix of before and after 
sanctions will do the job at the lowest cost?"

More at:

http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/richard-epstein-makes-sense/
-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to