Sadly, my spanish is not good enough to understand all that is being 
said in the video--but I do remember hearing that Fidel had previously 
written about the sinking of the South Korean navel vessel, arguing that 
it was not caused by North Korea as claimed, but more likely the result 
of a U.S. mine.

The consensus within the progressive community in South Korea is that 
the South Korean government is clearly lying when it claims that it has 
evidence linking North Korean to the sinking.  The South Korean 
government made these charges hoping to win big in recent local 
elections; much to their displeasure they took a beating.

Here is a link to a recent piece that highlights the weakness of the 
South Korean claims:  http://japanfocus.org/-Seunghun-Lee/3382

if you read the article you will be shocked at how weak the official 
claims actually are.

As to the actual cause of the sinking, no one is quite sure, but the 
general feeling within South Korean progressive circles has shifted from 
blaming a U.S. mine to a collision with a reef, which was in fact what 
the coast guard was initially told had happened when called to come to 
the rescue of the sailors.

Regardless, what is happening around this issue is very similar to what 
happened before the Iraq invasion, when the US put forward all sorts of 
claims of weapons of mass destruction to justify its invasion.  The 
media just repeats what it is told, in this case by the South Korean and 
US governments, never giving any legitimacy to those that challenge the 
official story.

Marty


On 7/13/2010 11:23 AM, Julio Huato wrote:
> In a panel devoted to discussing the danger of a nuclear war in the
> Korean peninsula or in the Middle East.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn5kumJ3vs4
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to