http://www.sundayindependent.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=5728687

Sunday Independent


   Returning to the gold standard is not a good idea

November 14, 2010 /Edition 1/

*Patrick Bond*

Should we take seriously the idea, promoted by World Bank president Robert Zoellick, to partially root the global monetary system in gold?

Is gold, as he claims, an "elephant in the room" because it might play a constructive role in reducing speculative turbulence and structural imbalances - or instead, is the fast-rising gold price merely a speculative bubble based on financial sector fears that authorities like US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke - who promised to push another $600 billion into the anemic US economy last week - won't perform their jobs in the ways bankers want?

"Bob Zoellick not only has a lot of historical perspective, but he also understands the global dynamics better than most," remarked Jim O'Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

The so-called "gold bugs" who promote the gold standard are also cheering.

Zoellick has a certain perspective, to be sure, fusing neoconservatism and neoliberalism, but does he really understand the way the world works?

Zoellick's background includes:

# A role in destroying the US Savings&Loan industry while a leading official at the US Treasury Deparment during the late 1980s; # Connivance in dangerous 1990s financial deregulatory strategies while serving as the second-ranking banker at top US housing lender FannieMae (which effectively went bankrupt in 2008); # Founding membership of the neocon Project for a New American Century (now formally defunct but by the late 1990s a crucial think tank for war-mongering against Iraq);
# Vote-counting duties in Florida on behalf of George W Bush in December 2000;
# Advisory relationships to Enron and Alliance Capital just before their early 2000s demise; # Wreckage of the World Trade Organisation at Cancun in 2003 while serving as Bush's no-compromise trade representative; # Mismanagement of US foreign policy (not to mention the deaths of over a million Iraqis and Afghanis) as deputy to Condolleezza Rice at the US State Department in 2005-06; # International executive management at Goldman Sachs just before the world financial crisis in 2006-07; and # Running the World Bank since 2007, claiming to transform it into a Green Bank and receptacle for climate finance, while in reality dramatically increasing coal lending (its largest-ever loan was in April to finance the world's fourth-largest coal-fired power plant, South Africa's own Medupi).

How much more damage can Zoellick do? A former US financial official and now a widely cited University of California professor, Brad de Long, called him "the stupidest man in the world" when the Financial Times ran Zoellick's arguments for rooting money in gold last Sunday.

It would be equally stupid for South African officials to entertain his idea, as Pravin Gordhan appeared to do last week.

What happened the last time we suffered a gold standard, in the years prior to 1932?

In 1929, South African bankers were extremely bullish about the local economy. Their ratio of loans to deposits soared from 63 percent in 1926 to 85 percent in 1930, with half the increase in 1929. Land speculation meant that "in some districts the value attributed to farm property looked to be 50 percent too high," according to Standard Bank's historian. (And today SA suffers the world's highest property bubble, four times the size of the US bubble at its peak, says The Economist.)

To illustrate the strain between local and international financial forces, Standard Bank was under a great deal of pressure to export funds to its London head office. The Reserve Bank intervened, imposing a levy for bank remittances and increasing the interest rate it charged local banks. (Likewise today, SA's outflows of profits, dividends and interest put us at the highest level among emerging markets, so high that last year The Economist rated SA the world's riskiest of 17 peer economies.)

The October 1929 crash was initially felt mainly by the diamond merchants, since rich New Yorkers' panic liquidation of their personal assets flattened diamond prices. As the general price level of most goods fell over the next few years, agricultural products bore the brunt.

When exports decline, one antidote is to devalue the currency. But when a country is on the gold standard, the currency is valued according to how much gold the country has in reserve. When such countries go deeply into debt and import more than they export, gold stocks decline to make payments.

Most major countries adopted the gold standard in the last quarter of the 19th century, mainly because of pressure from commercial capitalists to have convertible currency, to lubricate international trade. But during the 1930s, too many countries simply couldn't afford to back their currencies with gold, and in 1932, after Britain - still at the centre of international finance - abandoned the gold standard, 32 countries followed, with only France, Belgium, Switzerland and the Netherlands holding out until 1936.

As the world's leading gold producer at the time, South Africa had no technical difficulties remaining on the standard. But because the value of the currency remained high relative to other currencies, exports suffered. At the same time, investors were shifting enormous amounts of money out of South Africa. By the end of 1932, the tensions were overwhelming and the country's social fabric was tearing, so mining houses led the charge to abandon the gold standard and devalue the currency.

After South Africa ditched the gold standard in 1932, the tie to the currency was broken, and more gold could be mined without weighing down the rest of the economy.

But in a world where G20 leaders welcome the presence of men like Zoellick, as Jacob Zuma just did in Seoul, a much stronger push from labour and social movements will be needed to dislodge blockages to progress, including very zany ideas.

#

Bond is senior professor of development studies at UKZN and a visiting scholar of the University of California-Berkeley Department of Geography


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to