On Nov 14, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Max Sawicky wrote:
I'll probably regret asking this, but suppose Bldg 7 was blown up seven hours later? What other reason could there be but that it would be condemned anyway? And even if not, why should we give a shit? It wouldn't prove or even imply anything about the original deed.
To "take down" (it wasn't "blown up") a building it has to be very carefully prepped, with explosives in the right places so it falls into its own footprint. If 7, so 1&2. Explanation?
Shane Mage "Thunderbolt steers all things." Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 64
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
