http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703865004575648900250047766.html
--------------------------------------------snip
The 25-Year 'Foreclosure From Hell'

By ROBBIE WHELAN

OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, Fla.—Patsy Campbell could tell you a thing or two
about fighting foreclosure. She's been fighting hers for 25 years.

The 71-year-old retired insurance saleswoman has been living in her
house, a two-story on a half acre in a tidy middle-class neighborhood
here in central Florida, since 1978. The last time she made a mortgage
payment was October 1985.

And yet Ms. Campbell has been able to keep her house, protected by a
105-pound pit bull named Dodger and a locked, rusty gate advising
visitors to beware of the dog.

"They're not going to take this house," says Ms. Campbell. "I intend
to stay in this house and maintain it as my residence until I die."

Ms. Campbell's foreclosure case has outlasted two marriages, three
recessions and four presidents. She has seen seven great-grandchildren
born, plum real-estate markets come and go and the ownership of her
mortgage change six times. Many Florida real-estate lawyers say it is
the longest-lasting foreclosure case they have ever heard of.

The story of how Ms. Campbell has managed to avoid both paying her
mortgage and losing her home, which is currently assessed at more than
$203,000, is a cautionary tale for lenders that cut corners and
followed sloppy practices when originating, processing and servicing
mortgages. Lenders are especially vulnerable in the 23 states,
including Florida, that require foreclosures to be approved by a
judge.

Ms. Campbell has challenged her foreclosure on the grounds that her
mortgage was improperly transferred between banks and federal
agencies, that lawyers for the bank had waited too long to prosecute
the case, that a Florida law shields her from all her creditors, and
for dozens of other reasons. Once, she questioned whether there really
was a debt at all, saying the lender improperly separated the note
from the mortgage contract.

She has managed to stave off the banks partly because several courts
have recognized that some of her legal arguments have some
merit—however minor. Two foreclosure actions against her, for example,
were thrown out because her lender sat on its hands too long after
filing a case and lost its window to foreclose.

Ms. Campbell, who is handling her case these days without a lawyer,
has learned how to work the ropes of the legal system so well that she
has met every attempt by a lender to repossess her home with multiple
appeals and counteractions, burying the plaintiffs facing her under
piles of paperwork.

She offers no apologies for not paying her mortgage for 25 years,
saying that when a foreclosure is in dispute, borrowers are entitled
to stop making payments until the courts resolve the matter.

"This is every lender's nightmare," says Robert Summers, a Stuart,
Fla., real-estate lawyer who represents Commercial Services of Perry,
an Iowa-based buyer of distressed debt that currently owns Ms.
Campbell's mortgage and has been trying to foreclose. "Someone
defending a foreclosure action can raise defenses that are baseless,
but are obstacles for the foreclosing lender," he says, calling the
system "an unfair burden" for lenders.

While Ms. Campbell is an extreme case, more homeowners in trouble are
starting to use similar tactics and are hiring defense lawyers to
challenge their foreclosures, hoping to drag out the foreclosure
process long enough to reach a settlement with the lender.

Nationwide, there were 2.1 million mortgages in some stage of
foreclosure as of October, according to research firm LPS Applied
Analytics. The average loan in foreclosure—the process typically
starts when a loan becomes 90 days past due and a bank files a
complaint—had been in default for 492 days as of October, up from 289
days at the end of 2005, according to LPS. In Florida, one of the
states where foreclosures are handled by courts, the average loan in
foreclosure has been delinquent 596 days.

Okeechobee County, a rural jurisdiction of 40,000 known for bass- and
perch-fishing festivals, hasn't experienced a foreclosure problem as
intense as in many coastal regions of the state. Ms. Campbell's
house—which has vinyl siding, boards over the windows (to protect it
from storm damage, she says), a crumbling backyard swimming pool and
an old sedan rusting in the driveway—stands out among the manicured
lawns, stucco ranch houses and cattle pastures interspersed among the
houses.

In the town of Okeechobee, the county seat, signs of a local economy
dependent on agriculture abound: stores selling pre-fab barns, animal
feed and lumber line State Road 710 leading into town.

Brian Whitehall, Okeechobee's city administrator, says unemployment in
the area is hovering around 14.5%, slightly higher than the statewide
average of 12% in September. Foreclosure filings have nearly doubled
each year since the state's housing market peaked in 2006, with 617
filed in 2009. But the national housing slump and the area's economic
woes aren't immediately apparent in Okeechobee's quiet neighborhoods.

"We're not like the Port St. Lucies of the world, where entire
subdivisions are empty and it's like a ghost town," Mr. Whitehall
says.

Court records outline the rocky road Ms. Campbell's loan has taken
over the past 32 years. In 1978, Paul Campbell purchased the house on
SW 19th Lane, a few minutes' drive from the small pharmacy he owned,
using a $68,000 mortgage from First Federal Savings and Loan of Martin
County. He married Patsy in 1980, and died later that year from
emphysema, leaving the property to his wife.

In 1985, Ms. Campbell stopped making mortgage payments because of an
illness that caused her to lose income and get behind on her bills,
she says.

By then, the savings-and-loan crisis had begun to take hold. First
Federal merged with First Fidelity Savings and Loan, which assumed
ownership of the Campbell loan. In 1987, First Fidelity sold the
mortgage to American Pioneer Savings Bank, an Orlando-based lender
that collapsed in the early 1990s.

The loan would change hands four more times, and four different
lenders would try to foreclose on her. But every lender that held her
loan either merged or collapsed. Each time ownership of the lender
changed, the foreclosure case against Ms. Campbell would be dropped.

The loan eventually made its way to the Resolution Trust Corp., the
federally owned asset manager that liquidated assets of insolvent
S&Ls, and later, to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

In June 1998, the FDIC sold the mortgage to Commercial Services of
Perry, which filed to foreclose in 2000. After another illness, Ms.
Campbell deeded the house to her daughter, Deborah Pyper. Years later,
after Ms. Campbell recovered, the house was deeded back to her. Ms.
Pyper declined to comment.

Ms. Campbell's early briefs in the case were strongly worded and
colorful, drafted with the help of a now-retired Okeechobee County
lawyer.

The briefs presented dozens of reasons why Ms. Campbell thought the
bank didn't have the right to her house: Paul Campbell's signature was
forged on the original mortgage, she said, and the original sellers
never received money from the bank. At other times, she said the
mortgage was never properly conveyed between banks and federal
agencies, and she demanded paperwork that they were unable to
immediately produce.

Attorneys' fees and court costs from previous cases hadn't been paid,
or the amounts were wrong, she argued. One brief said that "Defendant
Campbell specifically denies the existence of any 'debt.'"

In 2007, a trial-court judge tossed out all but two of Ms. Campbell's
defenses, calling the case an "unnecessary paper chase which has been
an unproductive and unnecessary use of judicial resources."

Commercial Services paid a court-determined amount to settle court
costs from previous cases, and moved to take the foreclosure to trial,
with a date set for early October 2010.

In response, Ms. Campbell filed for bankruptcy, effectively blocking
the foreclosure until a stay is lifted by a bankruptcy-court judge.

Her filing lists $225,000 in real-property assets, and lists a secured
creditor's claim of $63,801, which is equal to the unpaid principal on
her mortgage. In previous court arguments, she had maintained that no
lender held a secured claim against her because the note was
improperly assigned.

A stern, confident woman who can quote Florida civil-procedure
statutes by reference number, and who adores cooking Southern food and
listening to classic Grand Ole Opry-era country music, Ms. Campbell
steadfastly believes she is right. Her most recent argument in the
case is that under Florida homestead law, the bank can't seize her
house because it is exempt from liens and forced sales.

"Commercial Services of Perry is in the business of doing this. They
win some, they lose some," she says. "If they had a case, they would
have already won it, years ago."

She maintains that at this point, no one owns her mortgage note, and
that because of fraud and paperwork mistakes by the banks that
transferred it over and over again in the 1990s, the debt has been
made void.

Mr. Summers, the lawyer for the lender, calls the case "the
foreclosure from hell." He says Ms. Campbell has appealed the case
seven times since he took it on in 2000, and all of her arguments are
just stalling tactics.

"It's almost like clockwork. You know you're going to get another
three-inch stack of documents every month or so, and you have to take
the time to read through it," Mr. Summers says. "That is a burden on
the courts, a burden on lawyers to decipher it, and it has enough meat
in it that it's not all void."

For example, according to Mr. Summers and to court filings, in 2007,
when a judge remanded the case to the trial court, a court clerk
failed to issue a mandate establishing the lower court's jurisdiction.
Ms. Campbell appealed the case on those grounds.

The bankruptcy should take about four months to adjudicate, Mr.
Summers says, at which point he intends to take the foreclosure to
trial. According to Commercial Services of Perry's latest filings, Ms.
Campbell owes the $63,801 in principal plus $148,000 in interest.

"All she's got to do is pay what she owes: the principal, the
interest, plus court costs and attorneys' fees," Mr. Summers says.
"But she doesn't get a free ride."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to