(Pethokoukis is the Money & Politics columnist for Reuters Breakingviews news 
service) 

Secret GOP plan: Push states to declare bankruptcy and smash unions
By James Pethokoukis
Reuters
December 7, 2010

Congressional Republicans appear to be quietly but methodically executing a 
plan that would a) avoid a federal bailout of spendthrift states and b) cripple 
public employee unions by pushing cash-strapped states such as California and 
Illinois to declare bankruptcy. This may be the biggest political battle in 
Washington, my Capitol Hill sources tell me, of 2011.

That’s why the most intriguing aspect of President Barack Obama’s tax deal with 
Republicans is what the compromise fails to include — a provision to continue 
the Build America Bonds program.  BABs now account for more than 20 percent of 
new debt sold by states and local governments thanks to a federal rebate equal 
to 35 percent of interest costs on the bonds. The subsidy program ends on Dec. 
31.  And my Reuters colleagues report that a GOP congressional aide said 
Republicans “have a very firm line on BABS — we are not going to allow them to 
be included.”

In short, the lack of a BAB program would make it harder for states to borrow 
to cover a $140 billion budgetary shortfall next year, as estimated by the 
Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. The long-term numbers are even 
scarier. Estimates of states’ unfunded liabilities to pay for retiree benefits 
range from $750 billion to more than $3 trillion.

Republicans in the House of Representatives already want to stop state and 
local governments from issuing tax-exempt bonds unless they are more forthright 
about these future obligations. Republican Representatives Devin Nunes and 
Darrell Issa of California and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin have introduced a bill 
that would require state and local governments to estimate the size of public 
pension liabilities if their assets earned a more conservative rate of return 
than many plans currently expect. Failure to do so would result in the 
suspension of their ability to issue tax-exempt bonds

Greater transparency on these obligations can’t be bad. In fact, the federal 
government itself would do well to report deficit numbers not just on the 
current cash-in, cash-out basis but also incorporating the underfunding of 
promised pension and healthcare benefits to retirees.

But it’s about more than just openness. Some Republicans hope the shock of the 
newly revealed debt totals will grease the way towards explicitly permitting 
states to declare bankruptcy. Indeed, legislation  amending federal bankruptcy 
law is currently being prepared by congressional Republicans. Local 
municipalities do declare bankruptcy from time to time, most famously 
California’s Orange County in 1994. But states can’t. Allowing them the same 
ability to renegotiate obligations could enable them to slash public employees’ 
lavish benefits, a big factor in their financial woes. In a recent issue of the 
The Weekly Standard, bankruptcy expert David Skeel of the University of 
Pennsylvania walks through the implications:

With liquidation off the table, the effectiveness of state bankruptcy would 
depend a great deal on the state’s willingness to play hardball with its 
creditors. The principal candidates for restructuring in states like California 
or Illinois are the state’s bonds and its contracts with public employees. 
Ideally, bondholders would vote to approve a restructuring. But if they dug in 
their heels and resisted proposals to restructure their debt, a bankruptcy 
chapter for states should allow (as municipal bankruptcy already does) for a 
proposal to be “crammed down” over their objections under certain 
circumstances. This eliminates the hold-out problem—the refusal of a minority 
of bondholders to agree to the terms of a restructuring—that can foil efforts 
to restructure outside of bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy law should give debtor states even more power to rewrite union 
contracts, if the court approves. Interestingly, it is easier to renegotiate a 
burdensome union contract in municipal bankruptcy than in a corporate 
bankruptcy. Vallejo has used this power in its bankruptcy case, which was filed 
in 2008. It is possible that a state could even renegotiate existing pension 
benefits in bankruptcy, although this is much less clear and less likely than 
the power to renegotiate an ongoing contract.

It wouldn’t be easy to change the law. Public employee unions have 
traditionally carried great influence with Democrats, even if President Barack 
Obama’s willingness to freeze their pay on the federal level suggests their 
clout may be waning.  From the Republican perspective, the fiscal crisis on the 
state level provides a golden opportunity to defund a key Democratic interest 
group. For the GOP, it’s an economic and political win.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to