December 7, 2010
Central Bank and Financiers Fight Over Fate of the Euro
By GRAHAM BOWLEY and JACK EWING
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/graham_bowley/
index.html?inline=nyt-per>

It is the battle that could well determine the fate of the euro.

On one side is the European Central Bank, which is spending billions to prop
up Europe¹s weak-kneed bond markets and safeguard the common currency.

On the other side are hedge funds and big financial institutions that are
betting against those same bonds and, by extension, against the central
bank, that mighty symbol of Europe¹s monetary union.

The war keeps escalating as traders position themselves for what some
believe is inevitable: a default by Greece, Ireland or perhaps even
Portugal.        

The strains grew Tuesday, when European finance ministers made no pledge to
increase the emergency fund that the European Union has put in place to help
protect the euro. The head of the International Monetary Fund, meantime,
urged Europe to take broader action to fend off speculators.

³The game now is one now of cat and mouse,² said Mohamed A. El-Erian, chief
executive of the bond giant Pimco.

Since May, when the Greek debt crisis exploded, the European Central Bank
has  bought an estimated $69 billion of Greek and other government bonds. It
has also indirectly injected hundreds of billions dollars into weak banking
systems in Greece and Ireland.

But the speculators keep coming back. After the bond purchases fell to zero
in October, the central bank waded back into the market aggressively last
week, buying about $2 billion of debt securities, mostly Irish and
Portuguese securities, traders said. The bank, based in Frankfurt, has yet
to disclose the size and scope of the purchases late last week, when its
intervention was the most intense.

While the bank appears to have backed off this week, traders are waiting for
the official accounting of its latest purchases. The data are due Monday ‹
and will provide some idea of just how aggressive the central bank has been.

Already, the central bank owns about 17 percent of the combined debt of
Greece, Ireland and Portugal, Goldman Sachs estimates. Yet in the bank¹s
mano a  mano with the bond market, psychology could be more important than
money. No single hedge fund, after all, can hope to outgun the central bank.

The bank also has the element of surprise. By emphasizing that the central
bank is ³permanently alert,² Jean-Claude Trichet, its president, has raised
the risk for speculators who might try to profit by selling short Greek,
Portuguese or Irish bonds.

But the amount of intervention so far is far smaller than many investors and
economists think is necessary to calm markets. These people assert that the
central bank, its assurances aside, is concerned about taking on so many
bonds of peripheral European countries ‹ and being forced into what would be
a de facto bailout of overextended government borrowers and the banks that
bought their bonds.

And the markets continue to probe that discomfort. Pimco, for example, sold
the vast majority of its holdings of Greek, Irish, Portuguese and Spanish
government bonds late last year and early this year, although it continues
to hold German bonds, considered Europe¹s safest.

Pavan Wadhwa, head of European rates strategy at JPMorgan Chase, one of the
main dealers in European government debt, said many clients had been eager
to sell bonds of peripheral European nations to the central bank and would
do more if the bank continued to buy, reflecting a belief that one or more
countries were headed for insolvency.

³If the E.C.B. wants to buy, I would still be recommending to sell into the
demand,² he said.  

Mr. Wadhwa said in its latest operations the central bank had hoped
investors would hold onto their bonds, encouraged by its presence in the
markets. Instead, many had taken the opportunity to sell.

The chief investment officer of a large New York-based hedge fund, who spoke
on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment
publicly, said his fund and others had shorted Portuguese and Irish
government bonds during the summer. They had done so by selling bonds in the
cash market directly but mainly by buying protection against default in the
market for credit-default swaps, a type of derivative.

³That trade was profitable,² this money manager said. But he said the fund
had closed its position because the trade had no further to run ‹ the market
was now discounting  a strong likelihood that Ireland would be forced to
restructure its debt in four or five years.

Even after the central bank¹s intervention last week, speculators have been
maintaining large positions in credit-default swaps on Spanish bonds and on
the debt of Spanish banks.

According to JPMorgan¹s calculations, the credit-default swaps  market
implies around a 15 percent probability in any year of a Spanish default for
the next five years.

Still, traders and analysts say the central bank is a sophisticated market
actor. It conducts many trades via the Bundesbank and other national central
banks, which in turn act through a circle of commercial dealer banks.

Mr. Trichet is known to keep a data terminal on his desk and speak
frequently with the bank¹s 20 in-house bond traders. He also occasionally
visits them on a lower floor of the bank¹s headquarters.

For the central bank, the timing of the latest flare-up was, in a way,
convenient. Bond trading typically tapers off at the end of the year as fund
managers close out their positions. So trading was thin and the bank was
able to move the market with relatively small sums, traders said.

³It may be that the E.C.B. could have moved spreads a long way without
buying that many bonds,² said Steven J. Major, global head of fixed income
research at HSBC in London.

By placing a lot of orders with numerous banks, the central bank also
created buzz in the market, which helped exaggerate the effect of its bond
buying.        

But according to many traders, the bank has so far not intervened in the
markets for Spanish or Italian debt, which would be harder to influence
because of their relatively large size.

 Stephen Castle contributed reporting.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to