"No agreement has been reached as to what labor theory of value is 
(Foley, 2000), Itoh, 1988; Kliman, 2006; Laibman, 1992 and Mohun, 2000). 
Paradoxically there are empirical studies showing strong association 
between labor values and market prices. Such works could inject new 
energy into Marxist theory of value; nevertheless some critics have 
questioned such empirical findings because: a) there is a problem of 
spurious correlation involved, and b) measures of association vary with 
changes in the physical units of the analyzed merchandises. We shall see 
that in this discussion there is a difficulty stemming from the 
definition of the problem as well as the question of the dimension of 
the mathematical models used. My main conclusions state that critics are 
wrong, and empirical studies are solid enough. These conclusions will be 
supported by two reasons: a) the existence of a spurious correlation 
does not apply to this problem according to the dimensional analysis, so 
well known in natural sciences, but seldom applied in economical 
problems; and b) dimensional analysis is essential to adequately pose 
the price-value association problem and thus to obtain measures that do 
not change with modifications of units of measurement."

This  quote is from my paper:
"Dimensional analysis of price-value correspondence: a spurious case of 
spurious correlation" Investigación económica, vol. LXIX, 274, 
octubre-diciembre de 2010,

Full text at: http://vallebaeza.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/valle_1.pdf

Alejandro Valle Baeza

El 08/12/2010 02:22 p.m., Jonathan Nitzan escribió:
> Testing the Labour Theory of Value: An Exchange
> by Paul Cockshott, Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan
> December, 2010
>
> THE QUESTIONS: Political economists have been testing the empirical
> validity of Marx's labour theory of value for several decades now. Do
> these tests corroborate the theory? Do they actually test it? Can they
> test it?
>
> FULL TEXT: http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/308/
>
> ***
>
> Recent additions and updates to the Bichler&  Nitzan Archives:
> http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/perl/latest
>
> Free to repost and circulate with due attribution under the Creative
> Commons License (attribution-noncommercial-no derivative). To
> unsubscribe, reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.
>

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to