December 8, 2010 / New York TIMES
In Tax Deal, Many Public Employees Will Pay More
By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
More bad news for government workers.

At a time when state and local governments across the country are
imposing furloughs and layoffs, and President Obama has frozen pay for
federal employees, it turns out that one of the few groups to face
higher federal taxes next year may be public sector employees.

The proposal to extend the Bush-era tax breaks unveiled by Mr. Obama
this week would offer a tax cut for most Americans. The deal would end
the Making Work Pay credit, which gave a tax reduction of up to $400
to workers with low and middle incomes. That credit will be replaced
by a 2 percent decrease in the payroll tax for Social Security for
people of all incomes.

But more than six million federal, state and local government
employees do not pay into Social Security at all. Instead, they pay
into public pension systems. So if the agreed proposal becomes law,
such employees will lose the $400 credit and would not reap any
benefit from the payroll tax cut.

According to the most recent statistics by the House Ways and Means
Committee, more than 174 million workers paid into Social Security in
2007, but about 5.7 million state and local government employees paid
into other pension systems. While the federal government has been
moving its work force into Social Security in recent decades, there
were still 600,000 employees excluded from it in 2007.

Some tax experts say that it is unfair for a $900 billion tax cut
package to give a quarter of its benefits to the top 1 percent of wage
earners while forcing public sector workers, who are largely middle
class, to have to pay more.

“It makes so little sense that you have to hope that the people who
negotiated this didn’t think it through,” said Robert McIntyre,
director of Citizens for Tax Justice, a public interest group aligned
with unions. “And when they do think it through, they’ll realize it’s
not fair. It would be cruel not to do something about it.”

Amy Brundage, a White House spokeswoman, acknowledged that the current
version of the plan could result in a higher tax bill in 2011 than
2010 for some government workers. But she stressed that the plan would
nonetheless spare them, and all taxpayers, a much steeper increase
that would have resulted if no deal had been struck and all the Bush
tax cuts were allowed to expire on Dec. 31.

While Mr. Obama had proposed an extension of the Making Work Pay
credit, the $120 billion payroll tax reduction worked out is twice as
large and will offer a break of up to $2,136 each to millions of
middle- and high-income taxpayers.

“The payroll tax cut would reduce taxes for over 155 million workers,
providing effective tax relief that will create jobs and boost the
economy,” Ms. Brundage said.

While many Democrats have criticized Mr. Obama for abandoning a
campaign pledge to let the cuts expire on the wealthiest 2 percent of
wage earners, Ms. Brundage said that the president did so only after
winning the extension of an assortment of credits for low-income
Americans and a 13-month extension of unemployment benefits.

“The cumulative impact of these provisions will be good for America’s
working families and our economy,” Ms. Brundage said.

Leaders of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees were muted in their reaction to the prospect of more taxes
for public employees.

The union spent $90 million to help elect Democrats during the last
election cycle, when Mr. Obama promoted a plan to preserve tax cuts
for all but the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. But Democratic
leaders in Congress declined to vote on the measure before the
elections and, after Republicans won control of the House, could not
win approval for it during the lame duck session of Congress.

“We are aware of it,” said Gregory King, a union spokesman, “and we
are discussing it with the appropriate leaders in Congress.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/business/economy/09tax.html

-- 
Jim Devine / "The conventional view serves to protect us from the
painful job of thinking."   - John Kenneth Galbraith
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to