Brian Dickerson: Governor recognizes data on employee compensation
doesn't say it all
1:32 AM, Feb. 3, 2011  |
76 Comments

   
*http://www.freep.com/article/20110203/COL04/102030466/Brian-Dickerson-Governor-recognizes-data-on-employee-compensation-doesn-t-say-it-all?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|s

Four days after Gov. Rick Snyder convened an economic summit to
explain to business leaders (and anyone else who cared to watch from
the virtual bleacher seats) precisely how dire our state's fiscal
outlook is, I'm still scratching my head over Snyder's decision to
highlight the gap between public- and private-sector worker
compensation.

In a state where Republican politicians seldom pass up a chance to
demonize government employee unions, the new governor has been careful
to avoid suggesting that public-sector compensation is primarily
responsible for Michigan's growing budgetary deficit.

And he warned reporters covering the summit not to leap to that
conclusion, pointing out that data suggesting the average
public-sector worker earns twice as much as his or her private-sector
counterpart had not been adjusted for differences in the education,
experience levels and job responsibilities of the two worker groups.

In other words, the only epiphany here may be just that full-time
workers who obtain college degrees, perform demanding work and have
acquired decades of on-the-job experience tend to earn more than
part-time employees who have neither comparable expertise nor job
responsibilities. Some unskilled private-sector workers might consider
that an injustice, but most of us recognize it as a fact of life.

"These are not apples-to-apples" comparisons, Snyder conceded after
this week's summit. "It's what I call macro-data."
So why bother?

That strikes me as a pretty disingenuous disclaimer for a man whose
party is champing at the bit to cut teachers, public safety workers
and bureaucrats of every stripe down to size. If the comparisons
between private- and public-sector compensation aren't relevant, why
bring them up at all -- unless you're hoping to stoke taxpayer
resentment of government workers?

But there are a number of reasons why vilifying public-sector
employees is a bad strategy.

The first, as Snyder has already tacitly admitted, is that relevant
numbers don't support the government-workers-are-eating
the-taxpayers'-lunch narrative some GOP demagogues are peddling.
Studies that compare workers with similar education credentials and
job responsibilities reveal far smaller disparities between public-
and private-sector compensation levels -- just as any economist who
studies job markets would expect them to.

The second reason why focusing on what workers make is a bad idea is
that it diverts public and legislative attention from more significant
inefficiencies in the provision of employee benefits.

Snyder's treasurer, Andy Dillon, likes to point out that some
municipalities pay more than 10 times as much as top-tier
private-sector employers to administer their employees' health
benefits. That doesn't mean public-sector health benefits are 10 times
as generous, it means only that local units of government have been
far less successful than private employers in exploiting economies of
scale, and that slashing employee benefit levels may yield little
savings, especially if Michigan's myriad units of government fail to
leverage their collective bargaining power more effectively.
Who's he gonna call?

But the best argument against demonizing government workers -- and the
one that ought to be the most obvious to a former CEO like Snyder --
is that any enterprise, public or private, is only as good as the
people who work for it. The new governor's ambitions to conjure a
smarter, more efficient government are doomed if those he's counting
on to execute his game plan become convinced their boss wants to
single them out as scapegoats.

Most of the goodwill Snyder currently enjoys arises from the public's
hope is that he is a pragmatist who prefers hard numbers to
soft-headed ideology. That makes it especially important that he
choose numbers that illuminate Michigan's plight, not those that
merely inflame his constituents.

Contact Brian Dickerson: 313-222-6584 or
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to