On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Jurriaan Bendien wrote:

> My experience with Rasmussen is that their polls are generally pretty 
> accurate. They are pretty high up in the polling performance stakes in the 
> US.

Your "experience," whatever that means, is wrong. They used to be good, but 
have gotten quite bad.

See, e.g.:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/rasmussen-polls-were-biased-and-inaccurate-quinnipiac-surveyusa-performed-strongly/

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/rasmussen-poll-on-wisconsin-dispute-may-be-biased/

Also:

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/is-rasmussen-reports-biased.html

> But there are other respects in which I'm much less sympathetic to 
> Rasmussen's case. In particular, this has to do with their choices of 
> question wording and subject matter. The Politico question, for instance, 
> points toward an August question in which Rasmussen asked "It’s always better 
> to cut taxes than to increase government spending because taxpayers, not 
> bureaucrats, are the best judges of how to spend their money.” That is not a 
> question designed to elicit the most accurate reflection of public opinion.
> 
> Likewise, Rasmussen recently produced a poll in which they purported to 
> describe the Democratic health care plan to their respondents. Several other 
> pollsters have found that support for the plan increases when it is actually 
> described to respondents, but Rasmussen showed no such increase. However, the 
> second sentence in their description reads:
> 
> The plans before Congress would prohibit people from choosing insurance plans 
> with lower premiums and higher deductibles.
> I don't particularly know where this comes from; Rasmussen claims that its 
> questions came from a 'summary of the legislation provided by the New York 
> Times', but such a depiction of the health care policy appears nowhere in the 
> New York Times article. But there it is in the Rasmussen survey, where it 
> appears to be designed to build a relationship in the respondent's mind 
> between the Democratic plan and higher premiums.



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to