I think that Fukuyama makes the argument that the common law is not as decentralized as often assumed and that it relies on a central authority for
its legitimacy and authority. Don't know how the argument works because only browsed in a bookstore. But I think that is one of F's arguments. I am betting that F's political histories of China and India are going to come under heavy scrutiny though the footnotes are very impressive, and show openness to historical works whatever their orientation. For example, the left historian Romila Thapar is relied on.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
